Social Co-Governance

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Wan Chunting, Lan Yuxin
{"title":"Social Co-Governance","authors":"Wan Chunting, Lan Yuxin","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past 20-30 years, industrialization and informatization made the society more complicated and social conflicts more difficult to deal with; citizens and their demands diversified, and we are now in urgent need of a new public administration model that suits the changed political, economic, and social conditions. Governance thus emerged worldwide, promoting government reforms and public participation, and urging the government to delegate and empower, and quit the fields that they are not good at managing. Scholars discuss the reasons for the emergence of governance from the perspectives of managerialism, the rise of civil society, and administrative reforms. But these are not the only reasons for governance to rise to prominence. It emerged, in a way, in response to the “legitimation crisis” described by Jurgen Habermas. As society develops, citizens require more legitimacy from the government on the basis of what it already provides, and this may involve performance, participation, responsiveness, law-based administration, etc. We hereby analyze the legitimation crisis in a postmodern society and point out that the paradigm of social co-governance is a response to these legitimacy demands and that multiple parties integrate their demands using governance tools such as participation, consultation, empowerment, etc.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"65-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341323","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the past 20-30 years, industrialization and informatization made the society more complicated and social conflicts more difficult to deal with; citizens and their demands diversified, and we are now in urgent need of a new public administration model that suits the changed political, economic, and social conditions. Governance thus emerged worldwide, promoting government reforms and public participation, and urging the government to delegate and empower, and quit the fields that they are not good at managing. Scholars discuss the reasons for the emergence of governance from the perspectives of managerialism, the rise of civil society, and administrative reforms. But these are not the only reasons for governance to rise to prominence. It emerged, in a way, in response to the “legitimation crisis” described by Jurgen Habermas. As society develops, citizens require more legitimacy from the government on the basis of what it already provides, and this may involve performance, participation, responsiveness, law-based administration, etc. We hereby analyze the legitimation crisis in a postmodern society and point out that the paradigm of social co-governance is a response to these legitimacy demands and that multiple parties integrate their demands using governance tools such as participation, consultation, empowerment, etc.
社会共同治理
在过去的20-30年里,工业化和信息化使社会变得更加复杂,社会矛盾更加难以处理;公民和他们的需求多样化,我们现在迫切需要一种适应变化了的政治、经济和社会条件的新的公共行政模式。治理由此在世界范围内兴起,推动政府改革和公众参与,敦促政府放权、放权,退出不擅长管理的领域。学者们从管理主义、公民社会的兴起、行政改革等角度探讨治理产生的原因。但这些并不是治理变得重要的唯一原因。在某种程度上,它的出现是对于尔根·哈贝马斯(Jurgen Habermas)所描述的“合法性危机”的回应。随着社会的发展,公民在政府已经提供的基础上对政府提出了更多的合法性要求,这可能涉及绩效、参与、响应、依法行政等方面。在此,我们分析了后现代社会的合法性危机,并指出社会共治范式是对这些合法性诉求的回应,多方利用参与、协商、赋权等治理工具整合他们的诉求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信