Complementation of analytical solutions for the quantitative roof stability analysis of rock cavities and tunnels

Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105556
Dowon Park
{"title":"Complementation of analytical solutions for the quantitative roof stability analysis of rock cavities and tunnels","authors":"Dowon Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study revisited a well-founded analytical solution describing the collapse profiles of tunnel roofs and estimated traditional stability measures to be used for quantitative safety assessment and practical engineering design. The original analytical approach was proposed by Fraldi and Guarracino based on a variational approach in the context of limit analysis, and subsequently extended to account for pore-pressure, seismic excitation, shallow buried depth, and axis-symmetric analysis, </span><em>etc</em><span>. In this study, the optimal bounds for the stability number, shear strength-based factor of safety, and support pressure were derived from the available original and extended analytical expressions of the failed block in both rectangular and circular tunnels. The computational results were in good agreement with those obtained with semi-analytical and numerical approaches but were obtained with much less computational effort. Regarding the tunnel at a shallow depth, a revised profile function was suggested by employing a different boundary condition that allowed the geometric restriction in the previous study to be eliminated; as a result, improved solutions could be obtained. All computation outcomes, including those of the extensions, were validated with those based on the piecewise linear failure mechanisms. The obtained failure mechanisms demonstrated an identical shape of the profile function in terms of curvature, and differences in safety measures were attributed to the dimension of the failed blocks. The proposed techniques in this study enrich the existing theoretical method while retaining its extreme simplicity.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":91100,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 105556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160923002307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study revisited a well-founded analytical solution describing the collapse profiles of tunnel roofs and estimated traditional stability measures to be used for quantitative safety assessment and practical engineering design. The original analytical approach was proposed by Fraldi and Guarracino based on a variational approach in the context of limit analysis, and subsequently extended to account for pore-pressure, seismic excitation, shallow buried depth, and axis-symmetric analysis, etc. In this study, the optimal bounds for the stability number, shear strength-based factor of safety, and support pressure were derived from the available original and extended analytical expressions of the failed block in both rectangular and circular tunnels. The computational results were in good agreement with those obtained with semi-analytical and numerical approaches but were obtained with much less computational effort. Regarding the tunnel at a shallow depth, a revised profile function was suggested by employing a different boundary condition that allowed the geometric restriction in the previous study to be eliminated; as a result, improved solutions could be obtained. All computation outcomes, including those of the extensions, were validated with those based on the piecewise linear failure mechanisms. The obtained failure mechanisms demonstrated an identical shape of the profile function in terms of curvature, and differences in safety measures were attributed to the dimension of the failed blocks. The proposed techniques in this study enrich the existing theoretical method while retaining its extreme simplicity.

补充了岩洞洞顶稳定性定量分析的解析解
本研究重新审视了一个有充分根据的解析解,描述了隧道顶板的坍塌剖面,并估计了用于定量安全评估和实际工程设计的传统稳定措施。最初的分析方法是由Fraldi和Guarracino在极限分析背景下基于变分方法提出的,随后扩展到考虑孔隙压力、地震激励、浅埋深度和轴对称分析等。根据现有的矩形和圆形隧道失稳块体的原始解析表达式和扩展解析表达式,推导出稳定数、基于抗剪强度的安全系数和支护压力的最优边界。计算结果与半解析法和数值法的结果一致,但计算量少得多。对于浅埋隧道,提出了一种修正剖面函数,采用不同的边界条件,消除了先前研究中的几何限制;因此,可以得到改进的解决方案。所有计算结果,包括扩展的计算结果,都与基于分段线性破坏机制的计算结果进行了验证。所获得的破坏机制在曲率方面表现出相同的轮廓函数形状,而安全措施的差异归因于破坏块体的尺寸。本研究中提出的技术丰富了现有的理论方法,同时保持了其极端的简单性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书