Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients’ Perceptions of Presurgical Discussions

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
R. Schwartz, R. Yip, N. You, C. Gillezeau, Kimberly J. Song, D. Yankelevitz, E. Taioli, C. Henschke, Raja Flores
{"title":"Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients’ Perceptions of Presurgical Discussions","authors":"R. Schwartz, R. Yip, N. You, C. Gillezeau, Kimberly J. Song, D. Yankelevitz, E. Taioli, C. Henschke, Raja Flores","doi":"10.1177/23814683221085570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Patients with early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have high survival rates, but patients often say they did not anticipate the effect of the surgery on their postsurgical quality of life (QoL). This study adds to the literature regarding patient and surgeon interactions and highlights the areas where the current approach is not providing good communication. Design Since its start in 2016, the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART), a prospective cohort study, has enrolled 543 patients who underwent surgery for stage I NSCLC within the Mount Sinai Health System. Presurgical patient and surgeon surveys were available for 314 patients, postsurgical surveys for 420, and both pre- and postsurgical surveys for 285. Results Of patients with presurgical surveys, 31.2% said that their surgeon recommended multiple types of treatment. Of patients with postsurgical surveys, 85.0% felt very well prepared and 11.4% moderately well prepared for their postsurgical recovery. The median Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung Cancer score and social support score of the patients who felt very well prepared was significantly higher than those moderately or not well prepared (24.0 v. 22.0, P < 0.001) and (5.0 [interquartile range: 4.7–5.0] v. 5.0 [IQR: 4.2–5.0], p = 0.015). Conclusions This study provides insight into the areas where surgeons are communicating well with their patients as well as the areas where patients still feel uninformed. Most surgeons feel that they prepare their patients well or very well for surgical recovery, whereas some patients still feel that their surgeons did not prepare them well for postsurgical recovery. Surgeons may want to spend additional time emphasizing postsurgical recovery and QoL with their patients or provide their patients with additional avenues to get their questions and concerns addressed. Highlights Pretreatment discussions could help surgeons understand patient priorities and patients understand the anticipated outcomes for their surgeries. There is an association between feeling prepared for surgery and higher quality of life and social support scores after adjustment for confounders. Despite these pretreatment discussions, patients still feel that they are not well prepared about what to expect during their postsurgical recovery.","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221085570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Patients with early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have high survival rates, but patients often say they did not anticipate the effect of the surgery on their postsurgical quality of life (QoL). This study adds to the literature regarding patient and surgeon interactions and highlights the areas where the current approach is not providing good communication. Design Since its start in 2016, the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART), a prospective cohort study, has enrolled 543 patients who underwent surgery for stage I NSCLC within the Mount Sinai Health System. Presurgical patient and surgeon surveys were available for 314 patients, postsurgical surveys for 420, and both pre- and postsurgical surveys for 285. Results Of patients with presurgical surveys, 31.2% said that their surgeon recommended multiple types of treatment. Of patients with postsurgical surveys, 85.0% felt very well prepared and 11.4% moderately well prepared for their postsurgical recovery. The median Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung Cancer score and social support score of the patients who felt very well prepared was significantly higher than those moderately or not well prepared (24.0 v. 22.0, P < 0.001) and (5.0 [interquartile range: 4.7–5.0] v. 5.0 [IQR: 4.2–5.0], p = 0.015). Conclusions This study provides insight into the areas where surgeons are communicating well with their patients as well as the areas where patients still feel uninformed. Most surgeons feel that they prepare their patients well or very well for surgical recovery, whereas some patients still feel that their surgeons did not prepare them well for postsurgical recovery. Surgeons may want to spend additional time emphasizing postsurgical recovery and QoL with their patients or provide their patients with additional avenues to get their questions and concerns addressed. Highlights Pretreatment discussions could help surgeons understand patient priorities and patients understand the anticipated outcomes for their surgeries. There is an association between feeling prepared for surgery and higher quality of life and social support scores after adjustment for confounders. Despite these pretreatment discussions, patients still feel that they are not well prepared about what to expect during their postsurgical recovery.
早期肺癌患者对术前讨论的认知
背景:早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存率很高,但患者通常表示他们没有预料到手术对其术后生活质量(QoL)的影响。这项研究增加了关于患者和外科医生互动的文献,并强调了当前方法不能提供良好沟通的领域。自2016年启动以来,早期肺癌研究治疗计划(IELCART)是一项前瞻性队列研究,已在西奈山卫生系统内招募了543名接受手术治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的患者。术前患者和外科医生调查314例,术后调查420例,术前和术后调查285例。结果在术前调查的患者中,31.2%的患者表示他们的外科医生推荐了多种治疗方法。在术后调查的患者中,85.0%的人对术后恢复有很好的准备,11.4%的人对术后恢复有一般的准备。感觉准备充分的患者的功能评估-肺癌评分和社会支持评分中位数显著高于准备一般或准备不充分的患者(24.0 vs . 22.0, P < 0.001)和(5.0[四分位数间距:4.7-5.0]vs . 5.0 [IQR: 4.2-5.0], P = 0.015)。结论:本研究为外科医生与患者良好沟通的领域以及患者仍然感到不了解的领域提供了见解。大多数外科医生认为他们为病人做好了手术恢复的准备,而一些病人仍然觉得他们的外科医生没有为他们的术后恢复做好准备。外科医生可能希望花更多的时间与患者一起强调术后恢复和生活质量,或者为患者提供更多的途径来解决他们的问题和担忧。预处理讨论可以帮助外科医生了解患者的优先事项,患者了解他们的手术预期结果。调整混杂因素后,手术准备感与较高的生活质量和社会支持评分之间存在关联。尽管有这些预处理讨论,患者仍然觉得他们对术后恢复期间的期望没有做好充分的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信