{"title":"Поэтика и политика периодического самиздата. Случай транспонанса","authors":"Максим Лепехин (Maksim Lepekhin)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article describes the position of the transfurist group within the field of Soviet unofficial culture and the way they used it to speak about the current state of the underground community. It shows that their self-positioning within this field as well as their overall aesthetic project were a reaction to their provincial status which marginalized them in the community. Apart from this, poets from Moscow and Leningrad saw transfurists as heirs of the Russian avant-garde, the movement that allegedly held the same ideological views as the Soviet state. The article demonstrates that, while taking on Futurist aesthetics, transfurists adopted a conceptual approach towards the avant-garde legacy and the poetic systems of their contemporaries. They invented ways of indicating the ambiguous position of unofficial culture, which was caught between “tradition” that had ended abruptly and new forms of literary mores and publicity. The paper argues that such a “conceptualist drive” was common for samizdat periodicals as one of the main tools of communication within the unofficial field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article describes the position of the transfurist group within the field of Soviet unofficial culture and the way they used it to speak about the current state of the underground community. It shows that their self-positioning within this field as well as their overall aesthetic project were a reaction to their provincial status which marginalized them in the community. Apart from this, poets from Moscow and Leningrad saw transfurists as heirs of the Russian avant-garde, the movement that allegedly held the same ideological views as the Soviet state. The article demonstrates that, while taking on Futurist aesthetics, transfurists adopted a conceptual approach towards the avant-garde legacy and the poetic systems of their contemporaries. They invented ways of indicating the ambiguous position of unofficial culture, which was caught between “tradition” that had ended abruptly and new forms of literary mores and publicity. The paper argues that such a “conceptualist drive” was common for samizdat periodicals as one of the main tools of communication within the unofficial field.
期刊介绍:
Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.