Plurilingualism and monolingualism in foreign language classrooms: The perspective of EFL teachers in Saudi Arabia

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ali Alsaawi
{"title":"Plurilingualism and monolingualism in foreign language classrooms: The perspective of EFL teachers in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Ali Alsaawi","doi":"10.2478/jolace-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The idea of teaching a target language via a monolingual medium of instruction in the classroom has long predominated in the pedagogical context. In Saudi Arabia, excluding the students’ mother tongue (Arabic) in the foreign language classroom has been seen as a tool that accelerates the acquisition of the target language (English). This is widely viewed as the most practical and effective method of language learning, especially in the Gulf region, where English is a foreign language employed in the fields of economics and business. The recent academic argument that exploiting the students’ linguistic repertoire, including the mother tongue, in the target language classroom boosts and fosters the students’ learning cycle is still encountering huge resistance, especially among second/foreign language teachers. To explore this dispute from the perspective of English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in intermediate and secondary schools, a case study was conducted with 34 teachers in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, through questionnaires and a focus group interview. The study found that most teachers believe that the policy of using the target language (English) only is the most effective method of language learning. They employed the students’ mother tongue (Arabic) on an ad hoc basis to ensure complete comprehension, organize classroom tasks or convey personal remarks. In addition, the study revealed that teachers’ understanding of plurilingualism was unclear and limited to the verbal use of two languages, and that EFL teachers need more clarification on its application in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":41689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"15 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The idea of teaching a target language via a monolingual medium of instruction in the classroom has long predominated in the pedagogical context. In Saudi Arabia, excluding the students’ mother tongue (Arabic) in the foreign language classroom has been seen as a tool that accelerates the acquisition of the target language (English). This is widely viewed as the most practical and effective method of language learning, especially in the Gulf region, where English is a foreign language employed in the fields of economics and business. The recent academic argument that exploiting the students’ linguistic repertoire, including the mother tongue, in the target language classroom boosts and fosters the students’ learning cycle is still encountering huge resistance, especially among second/foreign language teachers. To explore this dispute from the perspective of English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in intermediate and secondary schools, a case study was conducted with 34 teachers in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, through questionnaires and a focus group interview. The study found that most teachers believe that the policy of using the target language (English) only is the most effective method of language learning. They employed the students’ mother tongue (Arabic) on an ad hoc basis to ensure complete comprehension, organize classroom tasks or convey personal remarks. In addition, the study revealed that teachers’ understanding of plurilingualism was unclear and limited to the verbal use of two languages, and that EFL teachers need more clarification on its application in the classroom.
外语课堂中的多语制与单语制:沙特阿拉伯英语教师的视角
在课堂上通过单语教学媒介进行目的语教学的观点长期以来在教学语境中占据主导地位。在沙特阿拉伯,在外语课堂上排除学生的母语(阿拉伯语)被视为加速目标语言(英语)习得的一种工具。这被广泛认为是最实用、最有效的语言学习方法,尤其是在海湾地区,在那里,英语是一门用于经济和商业领域的外语。最近的学术观点认为,在目的语课堂中利用学生的语言技能,包括母语,可以促进和促进学生的学习周期,但这一观点仍然遇到了巨大的阻力,尤其是在第二语言/外语教师中。为了从中小学英语作为外语教师的角度探讨这一争议,本研究通过问卷调查和焦点小组访谈对沙特阿拉伯卡西姆地区的34名教师进行了案例研究。研究发现,大多数教师认为只使用目的语(英语)是最有效的语言学习方法。他们临时使用学生的母语(阿拉伯语),以确保完全理解,组织课堂任务或传达个人意见。此外,本研究还揭示了教师对多语性的理解不明确,并且仅限于两种语言的口头使用,EFL教师在课堂上的应用需要更多的澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Cultural Education
Journal of Language and Cultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信