Comparison of Morphological Analysis and DNA Metabarcoding of Crustacean Mesozooplankton in the Yellow Sea

Q4 Engineering
Garam Kim, Hyung-Ku Kang, Choong-gon Kim, Jae Ho Choi, S. Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Morphological Analysis and DNA Metabarcoding of Crustacean Mesozooplankton in the Yellow Sea","authors":"Garam Kim, Hyung-Ku Kang, Choong-gon Kim, Jae Ho Choi, S. Kim","doi":"10.4217/OPR.2021.43.1.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on marine zooplankton diversity and ecology are important for understanding marine ecosystem, as well as environmental conservation and fisheries management. DNA metabarcoding is known as a useful tool to reveal and understand diversity among animals, but a comparative evaluation with classical microscopy is still required in order to properly use it for marine zooplankton research. This study compared crustacean mesozooplankton taxa revealed by morphological analysis and metabarcoding of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI). A total of 17 crustacean species were identified by morphological analysis, and 18 species by metabarcoding. Copepods made up the highest proportion of taxa, accounting for more than 50% of the total number of species delineated by both methods. Cladocerans were not found by morphological analysis, whereas amphipods and mysids were not detected by metabarcoding. Unlike morphological analysis, metabarcoding was able to identify decapods down to the species level. There were some discrepancies in copepod species, which could be due to a lack of genetic database, or biases during DNA extraction, amplification, pooling and bioinformatics. Morphological analysis will be useful for ecological studies as it can classify and quantify the life history stages of marine zooplankton that metabarcoding cannot detect. Metabarcoding can be a powerful tool for determining marine zooplankton diversity, if its methods or database are further supplemented.","PeriodicalId":35665,"journal":{"name":"Ocean and Polar Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean and Polar Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2021.43.1.045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on marine zooplankton diversity and ecology are important for understanding marine ecosystem, as well as environmental conservation and fisheries management. DNA metabarcoding is known as a useful tool to reveal and understand diversity among animals, but a comparative evaluation with classical microscopy is still required in order to properly use it for marine zooplankton research. This study compared crustacean mesozooplankton taxa revealed by morphological analysis and metabarcoding of the cytochrome oxidase I (COI). A total of 17 crustacean species were identified by morphological analysis, and 18 species by metabarcoding. Copepods made up the highest proportion of taxa, accounting for more than 50% of the total number of species delineated by both methods. Cladocerans were not found by morphological analysis, whereas amphipods and mysids were not detected by metabarcoding. Unlike morphological analysis, metabarcoding was able to identify decapods down to the species level. There were some discrepancies in copepod species, which could be due to a lack of genetic database, or biases during DNA extraction, amplification, pooling and bioinformatics. Morphological analysis will be useful for ecological studies as it can classify and quantify the life history stages of marine zooplankton that metabarcoding cannot detect. Metabarcoding can be a powerful tool for determining marine zooplankton diversity, if its methods or database are further supplemented.
黄海甲壳纲中浮游动物形态分析与DNA元条形码比较
对海洋浮游动物多样性和生态学的研究对于理解海洋生态系统、环境保护和渔业管理具有重要意义。众所周知,DNA代谢编码是揭示和理解动物多样性的有用工具,但为了将其正确用于海洋浮游动物研究,仍需要与经典显微镜进行比较评估。本研究比较了通过细胞色素氧化酶I(COI)的形态学分析和代谢编码揭示的甲壳类动物-中型浮游动物分类群。通过形态学分析共鉴定出17种甲壳类动物,通过代谢条形码鉴定出18种。桡足类在分类群中所占比例最高,占两种方法所划分物种总数的50%以上。通过形态学分析没有发现枝角类,而通过代谢编码没有检测到片脚类和mysides。与形态学分析不同,代谢条形码能够识别下至物种水平的十足类动物。桡足类物种存在一些差异,这可能是由于缺乏基因数据库,或者在DNA提取、扩增、汇集和生物信息学过程中存在偏差。形态学分析将有助于生态学研究,因为它可以对代谢条形码无法检测到的海洋浮游动物的生活史阶段进行分类和量化。如果进一步补充其方法或数据库,代谢编码可以成为确定海洋浮游动物多样性的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean and Polar Research
Ocean and Polar Research Engineering-Ocean Engineering
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信