The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests

IF 1.3 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Acta Technologica Agriculturae Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.2478/ata-2022-0023

P. Kuchar, I. Janoško, M. Holubek, J. Čedík, M. Pexa

{"title":"The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests","authors":"P. Kuchar, I. Janoško, M. Holubek, J. Čedík, M. Pexa","doi":"10.2478/ata-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper presented deals with the accuracy of three selected devices based on acceleration measurement: accelerometer – XL meter, the global position measurement device by VBox and the constructed 5th wheel, which allows a very accurate measurement of distance along with speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The accuracy of recordings was tested during various driving conditions when all the three measuring devices were attached to the vehicle. Measurements showed that GPS-based measuring devices level off and even surpass accelerometers when used in locations with a good view of the sky. The 5th wheel provided the most representative results, as the difference between average and real standard deviations of the measured distance were 0.78%, 1.38%, 3.48% for the 5th wheel, VBox GPS and XL meter, respectively. The accuracy of the 5th wheel and VBox can be considered very high when taking into account the fact that dynamic actions were monitored. The paper purpose is to point out the significance of measuring device selection in assessing the distance travelled by the vehicle.","PeriodicalId":43089,"journal":{"name":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The paper presented deals with the accuracy of three selected devices based on acceleration measurement: accelerometer – XL meter, the global position measurement device by VBox and the constructed 5th wheel, which allows a very accurate measurement of distance along with speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The accuracy of recordings was tested during various driving conditions when all the three measuring devices were attached to the vehicle. Measurements showed that GPS-based measuring devices level off and even surpass accelerometers when used in locations with a good view of the sky. The 5th wheel provided the most representative results, as the difference between average and real standard deviations of the measured distance were 0.78%, 1.38%, 3.48% for the 5th wheel, VBox GPS and XL meter, respectively. The accuracy of the 5th wheel and VBox can be considered very high when taking into account the fact that dynamic actions were monitored. The paper purpose is to point out the significance of measuring device selection in assessing the distance travelled by the vehicle.

查看原文本刊更多论文

车辆动态试验中测距装置的精度评定

摘要:本文介绍了基于加速度测量的三种装置的精度:加速度计- XL仪表，VBox的全局位置测量装置和构建的第5轮，可以非常精确地测量车辆的距离、速度和加速度。当三个测量装置都安装在车辆上时，在不同的驾驶条件下测试了记录的准确性。测量结果表明，在天空视野良好的地方，基于gps的测量设备会趋于平稳，甚至超过加速度计。第5轮的测量结果最具代表性，第5轮、VBox GPS和XL meter测量距离的平均标准差与实际标准差之差分别为0.78%、1.38%、3.48%。考虑到动态动作被监控的事实，第五轮和VBox的精度可以被认为是非常高的。本文的目的是指出测量装置的选择在评估车辆行驶距离中的意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Technologica Agriculturae AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

28.60%

发文量

审稿时长

18 weeks

期刊介绍： Acta Technologica Agriculturae is an international scientific double-blind peer reviewed journal focused on agricultural engineering. The journal is multidisciplinary and publishes original research and review papers in engineering, agricultural and biological sciences, and materials science. Aims and Scope Areas of interest include but are not limited to: agricultural and biosystems engineering; machines and mechanization of agricultural production; information and electrical technologies; agro-product and food processing engineering; physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic, soil working machinery and terramechanics; renewable energy sources and bioenergy; rural buildings; related issues from applied physics and chemistry, ecology, economy and energy.