Unraveling key drivers for engineer creativity and meaningfulness of work: Bayesian network approach

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Warit Wipulanusat, K. Panuwatwanich, R. Stewart, P. Parnphumeesup, J. Sunkpho
{"title":"Unraveling key drivers for engineer creativity and meaningfulness of work: Bayesian network approach","authors":"Warit Wipulanusat, K. Panuwatwanich, R. Stewart, P. Parnphumeesup, J. Sunkpho","doi":"10.24425/MPER.2020.133726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study builds on an existing structural model developed to examine the influence of leadership and organizational culture on innovation and satisfaction of engineers in Australian public sectors (APS). The objective of this study is to increase the understanding of innovation process with a focus on causal relationships among critical factors. To achieve this objective, the study develops an assessment approach to help predict creativity and work meaningfulness of engineers in the APS. Three quantitative analysis methods were sequentially conducted in this study including correlation analysis, path analysis, and Bayesian networks. A correlation analysis was conducted to pinpoint the strong association between key factors studied. Subsequently, path analysis was employed to identify critical pathways which were accordingly used as a structure to develop Bayesian networks. The findings of the study revealed practical strategies for promoting (1) transformational leadership and (2) innovative culture in public sector organizations since these two factors were found to be key drivers for individual creativity and work meaningfulness of their engineers. This integrated approach may be used as a decision support tool for managing the innovation process for engineers in the public sectors.","PeriodicalId":45454,"journal":{"name":"Management and Production Engineering Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Production Engineering Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/MPER.2020.133726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study builds on an existing structural model developed to examine the influence of leadership and organizational culture on innovation and satisfaction of engineers in Australian public sectors (APS). The objective of this study is to increase the understanding of innovation process with a focus on causal relationships among critical factors. To achieve this objective, the study develops an assessment approach to help predict creativity and work meaningfulness of engineers in the APS. Three quantitative analysis methods were sequentially conducted in this study including correlation analysis, path analysis, and Bayesian networks. A correlation analysis was conducted to pinpoint the strong association between key factors studied. Subsequently, path analysis was employed to identify critical pathways which were accordingly used as a structure to develop Bayesian networks. The findings of the study revealed practical strategies for promoting (1) transformational leadership and (2) innovative culture in public sector organizations since these two factors were found to be key drivers for individual creativity and work meaningfulness of their engineers. This integrated approach may be used as a decision support tool for managing the innovation process for engineers in the public sectors.
揭示工程师创造力和工作意义的关键驱动因素:贝叶斯网络方法
本研究建立在现有结构模型的基础上,旨在研究领导和组织文化对澳大利亚公共部门(APS)工程师创新和满意度的影响。本研究的目的是增加对创新过程的理解,重点关注关键因素之间的因果关系。为了实现这一目标,本研究开发了一种评估方法来帮助预测APS工程师的创造力和工作意义。本研究依次采用了相关分析、通径分析和贝叶斯网络三种定量分析方法。进行了相关分析,以确定所研究的关键因素之间的强相关性。随后,路径分析被用来识别关键路径,并以此作为发展贝叶斯网络的结构。研究结果揭示了促进公共部门组织(1)变革型领导和(2)创新文化的实用策略,因为这两个因素被发现是工程师个人创造力和工作意义的关键驱动因素。这种综合方法可以用作公共部门工程师管理创新过程的决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, management of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simulation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信