“Dual-experiences” of treatment for anorexia nervosa: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of experiences of treatment by service providers who are recovered service users

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Emma Curry, Panoraia Andriopoulou
{"title":"“Dual-experiences” of treatment for anorexia nervosa: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of experiences of treatment by service providers who are recovered service users","authors":"Emma Curry, Panoraia Andriopoulou","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-02-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe aim of this study is to explore the dual-experiences of AN recovered service providers. Prognoses for anorexia nervosa (AN) and anorexia nervosa-like (AN-like) presenting patients remain poor, and notably, no current treatment approach is reliably successful. Past research into AN has focused on singular experiences, those of either AN patients or those of practitioners providing treatment, but has yet to explore the experiences of recovered AN service users now working as AN service providers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, four UK-based female participants shared their dual experiences of treatment for AN or AN-like presentations through individual semi-structured interviews. Data collection and analysis were conducted in accordance with an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis methodology.\n\n\nFindings\nAnalysis revealed four primary themes, including barriers to accessing services; the impact of treating professionals’ approaches; displacement of responsibility for treating AN; and the value of dual-experience of AN.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study focuses on AN and AN-like presentations and does not address the other eating disorders. Additionally, only female-identifying individuals volunteered their participation. As such, this study is notably lacking the voices of individuals of other genders.\n\n\nPractical implications\nParticipant narratives suggest that improvements in the treatment of AN lie in improving professionals’ understanding of – and compassion towards – this patient group to optimise the power of the therapeutic relationship across all AN-treating professions.\n\n\nSocial implications\nParticipants revealed a pervasive misunderstanding of AN among treating professionals that is hindering patients’ treatment and suggested that lived experience can be an asset in a professional context.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIndividuals with dual experiences of AN can provide a unique and reflective insight into experiences of treatment through their combined personal and professional expertise and elucidate the experiences that both helped and hindered their own recovery.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-02-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the dual-experiences of AN recovered service providers. Prognoses for anorexia nervosa (AN) and anorexia nervosa-like (AN-like) presenting patients remain poor, and notably, no current treatment approach is reliably successful. Past research into AN has focused on singular experiences, those of either AN patients or those of practitioners providing treatment, but has yet to explore the experiences of recovered AN service users now working as AN service providers. Design/methodology/approach In this study, four UK-based female participants shared their dual experiences of treatment for AN or AN-like presentations through individual semi-structured interviews. Data collection and analysis were conducted in accordance with an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis methodology. Findings Analysis revealed four primary themes, including barriers to accessing services; the impact of treating professionals’ approaches; displacement of responsibility for treating AN; and the value of dual-experience of AN. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on AN and AN-like presentations and does not address the other eating disorders. Additionally, only female-identifying individuals volunteered their participation. As such, this study is notably lacking the voices of individuals of other genders. Practical implications Participant narratives suggest that improvements in the treatment of AN lie in improving professionals’ understanding of – and compassion towards – this patient group to optimise the power of the therapeutic relationship across all AN-treating professions. Social implications Participants revealed a pervasive misunderstanding of AN among treating professionals that is hindering patients’ treatment and suggested that lived experience can be an asset in a professional context. Originality/value Individuals with dual experiences of AN can provide a unique and reflective insight into experiences of treatment through their combined personal and professional expertise and elucidate the experiences that both helped and hindered their own recovery.
神经性厌食症治疗的“双重体验”:对康复服务使用者服务提供者治疗体验的解释性现象学分析
目的探讨网络康复服务提供者的双重体验。神经性厌食症(AN)和神经性厌食症样(AN-like)患者的预后仍然很差,值得注意的是,目前没有可靠的治疗方法是成功的。过去对人工神经网络的研究主要集中在单一的经历上,即人工神经网络患者或提供治疗的从业人员的经历,但尚未探索康复后的人工神经网络服务使用者现在作为人工神经网络服务提供者的经历。设计/方法/方法在这项研究中,四位来自英国的女性参与者通过个人半结构化访谈分享了她们治疗AN或类似AN的双重经历。数据收集和分析是按照解释性现象学分析方法进行的。分析结果揭示了四个主要主题,包括获取服务的障碍;治疗专业人员方法的影响;治疗AN的责任转移;AN的双重经验价值。研究局限性/意义本研究主要关注AN和AN样表现,未涉及其他饮食失调。此外,只有女性自愿参与。因此,这项研究明显缺乏其他性别个体的声音。实际意义参与者的叙述表明,AN治疗的改进在于提高专业人员对该患者群体的理解和同情,以优化所有AN治疗专业的治疗关系的力量。社会意义:参与者揭示了专业治疗人员对急性脑梗死的普遍误解,这阻碍了患者的治疗,并表明生活经验在专业背景下可能是一种资产。原创性/价值具有双重AN经历的个体可以通过他们的个人和专业知识的结合,对治疗经历提供独特和反思的见解,并阐明帮助和阻碍他们自己康复的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信