Student reflections on doctoral learning: challenges and breakthroughs

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Owens, D. Brien, E. Ellison, C. Batty
{"title":"Student reflections on doctoral learning: challenges and breakthroughs","authors":"A. Owens, D. Brien, E. Ellison, C. Batty","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-04-2019-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere has been sustained interest in how to support doctoral students through the often-gruelling journey they undertake from enrolment to graduation. Although doctoral numbers and successful completions have been steadily increasing globally as well as in Australia, the quality of student progression and outcomes has been widely interrogated and criticised in the literature that is reported in this paper. The authors’ interest as experienced research higher degree supervisors and research leaders in the creative arts and humanities prompted a research project that aimed to better understand the challenges and breakthroughs involved in completing a doctorate from the perspective of candidates themselves.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis was implemented through an action learning collaboration with 18 students from three Australian universities facilitated by four research supervisors.\n\n\nFindings\nThe main findings presented in this paper include the necessity for maintaining, brokering and supporting a range of relationships; understanding expectations of research study and embracing the need for agility in managing these; and finally, using techniques to improve personal agency and ownership of the transformative journey of research higher degree candidature. The importance of establishing an understanding of the multidimensional human experience of doing a doctorate and providing appropriate support through enhanced forms of research training emerged as a core finding from this research project.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe relatively small number of research participants in this study and the discipline-specific focus prohibits generalizability of findings; however, the collaborative, action learning method adopted represents an approach that is both productive and transferable to other contexts and disciplines.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFurther research might investigate the relevance of the findings from this research to doctoral students in other disciplines and/or institutions or apply the collaborative action learning approach to doctoral training presented here to a range of contexts and cohorts.\n\n\nSocial implications\nImproving doctoral training options to support the multidimensional needs of candidates can better assure the mental and emotional well-being of doctoral students (essential to their continuing intellectual development and sense of agency) through developing sustainable relationships and realistic expectations. This in turn has the potential to address the consistently high attrition rates in doctoral programmes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research contributes new insights from doctoral students on the challenges and breakthroughs experienced by them as they pursue original research through formal study and present a novel, collaborative and empowering approach to doctoral training that can be applied in diverse setting.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/sgpe-04-2019-0048","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-04-2019-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose There has been sustained interest in how to support doctoral students through the often-gruelling journey they undertake from enrolment to graduation. Although doctoral numbers and successful completions have been steadily increasing globally as well as in Australia, the quality of student progression and outcomes has been widely interrogated and criticised in the literature that is reported in this paper. The authors’ interest as experienced research higher degree supervisors and research leaders in the creative arts and humanities prompted a research project that aimed to better understand the challenges and breakthroughs involved in completing a doctorate from the perspective of candidates themselves. Design/methodology/approach This was implemented through an action learning collaboration with 18 students from three Australian universities facilitated by four research supervisors. Findings The main findings presented in this paper include the necessity for maintaining, brokering and supporting a range of relationships; understanding expectations of research study and embracing the need for agility in managing these; and finally, using techniques to improve personal agency and ownership of the transformative journey of research higher degree candidature. The importance of establishing an understanding of the multidimensional human experience of doing a doctorate and providing appropriate support through enhanced forms of research training emerged as a core finding from this research project. Research limitations/implications The relatively small number of research participants in this study and the discipline-specific focus prohibits generalizability of findings; however, the collaborative, action learning method adopted represents an approach that is both productive and transferable to other contexts and disciplines. Practical implications Further research might investigate the relevance of the findings from this research to doctoral students in other disciplines and/or institutions or apply the collaborative action learning approach to doctoral training presented here to a range of contexts and cohorts. Social implications Improving doctoral training options to support the multidimensional needs of candidates can better assure the mental and emotional well-being of doctoral students (essential to their continuing intellectual development and sense of agency) through developing sustainable relationships and realistic expectations. This in turn has the potential to address the consistently high attrition rates in doctoral programmes. Originality/value This research contributes new insights from doctoral students on the challenges and breakthroughs experienced by them as they pursue original research through formal study and present a novel, collaborative and empowering approach to doctoral training that can be applied in diverse setting.
学生对博士学习的反思:挑战与突破
目的人们一直对如何支持博士生度过从入学到毕业的艰难旅程感兴趣。尽管在全球和澳大利亚,博士人数和成功完成学业的人数一直在稳步增加,但在本文报道的文献中,学生的进步和成绩受到了广泛的质疑和批评。作者作为创意艺术和人文学科的经验丰富的研究高级学位导师和研究领导者的兴趣促使他们开展了一个研究项目,旨在从候选人自身的角度更好地了解完成博士学位所面临的挑战和突破。设计/方法论/方法这是通过与来自三所澳大利亚大学的18名学生的行动学习合作来实施的,由四名研究主管协助。调查结果本文提出的主要调查结果包括维持、促成和支持一系列关系的必要性;理解对研究性学习的期望,并接受在管理这些期望时对灵活性的需求;最后,使用技术来提高个人代理权和所有权,从而实现更高学历候选人研究的变革之旅。建立对攻读博士学位的多维人类体验的理解,并通过加强形式的研究培训提供适当支持,这一重要性成为该研究项目的核心发现。研究局限性/含义本研究的研究参与者人数相对较少,学科特定的重点阻碍了研究结果的可推广性;然而,所采用的合作、行动学习方法代表了一种既有成效又可转移到其他环境和学科的方法。实际含义进一步的研究可能会调查这项研究的发现与其他学科和/或机构的博士生的相关性,或者将本文提出的合作行动学习方法应用于一系列背景和群体的博士培训。社会影响通过发展可持续的关系和现实的期望,改善博士培训选项以支持候选人的多维需求,可以更好地确保博士生的心理和情感健康(对他们的持续智力发展和代理感至关重要)。这反过来又有可能解决博士课程中持续高流失率的问题。原创性/价值这项研究为博士生提供了新的见解,让他们了解他们在通过正式学习进行原创性研究时所经历的挑战和突破,并为博士培训提供了一种新颖、协作和赋权的方法,可以应用于不同的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信