Quality Assurance, Meet Quality Appreciation: Using Appreciative Inquiry to Define Faculty Quality Standards

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Morgan, Rebecca L. Jobe, Juli Konopa, L. D. Downs
{"title":"Quality Assurance, Meet Quality Appreciation: Using Appreciative Inquiry to Define Faculty Quality Standards","authors":"A. Morgan, Rebecca L. Jobe, Juli Konopa, L. D. Downs","doi":"10.18870/hlrc.v12i1.1301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study outlines the journey of an online university to evaluate faculty performance standards, key performance indicators, and systems for quality assurance using an appreciative inquiry summit model. The study reveals the power of quality appreciation as an approach that elicits a shared vision for quality definitions and standards and serves as a historical marker in the higher education shift from data-driven faculty performance approaches to strengths-based, inclusive methods. Method: The retrospective business case outlines one university’s 2018 Appreciative Inquiry Summit, 5D (define, discover, dream, design, destiny/deliver) approach, resulting deliverables, lessons learned, and conclusions. Results: The summit and subsequent quality appreciation processes laid a foundation for inclusive leadership and inclusive teaching and learning. Quality appreciation was observed to be a third component to quality enhancement that had heretofore included quality control and quality assurance mechanisms. Quality appreciation, based on appreciative inquiry (AI) approaches, is a method for uncovering the positive core of an organization that results in ideal quality standards, definitions, and desires for ongoing quality creation. Conclusions: This case provides a view of one university’s building upon data-driven methods for faculty performance evaluation. The use of appreciative inquiry to advance a quality appreciation agenda and human-centered approaches served as a stepping-stone toward a vision for inclusive, strengths-based quality enhancement. Implication for Theory and/or Practice: Quality control mechanisms and systems for quality assurance are supported by quality appreciation. In this case, faculty quality appreciation is the integration of AI practices with ongoing evaluation and identification of faculty and classroom quality standards. Quality Appreciation leads to strengthened definitions of quality that are values-driven and founded in the heart and soul of the university’s teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":37033,"journal":{"name":"Higher Learning Research Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Learning Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v12i1.1301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: This study outlines the journey of an online university to evaluate faculty performance standards, key performance indicators, and systems for quality assurance using an appreciative inquiry summit model. The study reveals the power of quality appreciation as an approach that elicits a shared vision for quality definitions and standards and serves as a historical marker in the higher education shift from data-driven faculty performance approaches to strengths-based, inclusive methods. Method: The retrospective business case outlines one university’s 2018 Appreciative Inquiry Summit, 5D (define, discover, dream, design, destiny/deliver) approach, resulting deliverables, lessons learned, and conclusions. Results: The summit and subsequent quality appreciation processes laid a foundation for inclusive leadership and inclusive teaching and learning. Quality appreciation was observed to be a third component to quality enhancement that had heretofore included quality control and quality assurance mechanisms. Quality appreciation, based on appreciative inquiry (AI) approaches, is a method for uncovering the positive core of an organization that results in ideal quality standards, definitions, and desires for ongoing quality creation. Conclusions: This case provides a view of one university’s building upon data-driven methods for faculty performance evaluation. The use of appreciative inquiry to advance a quality appreciation agenda and human-centered approaches served as a stepping-stone toward a vision for inclusive, strengths-based quality enhancement. Implication for Theory and/or Practice: Quality control mechanisms and systems for quality assurance are supported by quality appreciation. In this case, faculty quality appreciation is the integration of AI practices with ongoing evaluation and identification of faculty and classroom quality standards. Quality Appreciation leads to strengthened definitions of quality that are values-driven and founded in the heart and soul of the university’s teaching and learning.
质量保证满足质量欣赏——用欣赏性探究界定教师质量标准
目的:本研究概述了一所在线大学使用赞赏性调查峰会模型评估教师绩效标准、关键绩效指标和质量保证体系的历程。这项研究揭示了质量评估的力量,它是一种引发对质量定义和标准的共同愿景的方法,也是高等教育从数据驱动的教师绩效方法向基于优势的包容性方法转变的历史标志。方法:回顾性商业案例概述了一所大学2018年感恩探究峰会5D(定义、发现、梦想、设计、命运/交付)方法、最终交付成果、经验教训和结论。结果:峰会和随后的质量评估过程为包容性领导和包容性教学奠定了基础。据观察,质量评估是质量提高的第三个组成部分,迄今为止,质量提高包括质量控制和质量保证机制。基于赞赏探究(AI)方法的质量赞赏是一种揭示组织积极核心的方法,可以产生理想的质量标准、定义和持续质量创造的愿望。结论:本案例为一所大学建立基于数据驱动的教师绩效评估方法提供了一个视角。利用欣赏性调查来推进质量欣赏议程和以人为本的方法,是实现包容性、基于优势的质量提升愿景的垫脚石。对理论和/或实践的启示:质量控制机制和质量保证体系得到质量评估的支持。在这种情况下,教师质量评估是将人工智能实践与教师和课堂质量标准的持续评估和识别相结合。对质量的欣赏会强化对质量的定义,这些定义是由价值观驱动的,并建立在大学教学的核心和灵魂中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Learning Research Communications
Higher Learning Research Communications Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信