“Unlocking Safe Spaces for comprehensive SRHR”: Advocacy for women’s and adolescent girls’ right to access safe abortion in Zimbabwe

Q4 Arts and Humanities
M. Mushunje
{"title":"“Unlocking Safe Spaces for comprehensive SRHR”: Advocacy for women’s and adolescent girls’ right to access safe abortion in Zimbabwe","authors":"M. Mushunje","doi":"10.1080/10130950.2022.2128836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract Abortion remains highly contested in Zimbabwe and this stems from deeply rooted and set convictions based on religious, traditional, cultural, and moralistic persuasions. Political will to commit to unrestricted conditions for abortions also remains very limited as evidenced by the continued hesitancy to review the 1977 Termination of Pregnancy Act (ToP) (Chapter 15:10) which allows for abortion under the circumstances of rape, incest and health. There have been concerted efforts to engage in advocacy campaigns for the review of the ToP to allow for more liberal conditions and this has seen feminists coming together to influence various constituencies. Advocacy efforts have centred on conducting a multi-lane approach comprised of Values Clarification Attitudes and Transformation exercises with traditional leaders, Parliamentarians, religious and cultural leaders; engagement with Ministries of Justice, Health, Education; media engagement of feminist reporters for informed and transformative reporting on abortion, and linking with global campaigns for ongoing learnings. To date, the advocacy has resulted in the abortion agenda being discussed in Parliament and there is evidence of more progressive attitudes by gate keepers and opinion leaders. Draft regulations and a new ToP Bill have been developed by the feminist advocates, both of which have been submitted to Ministry of Justice for adoption. Contained within these are proposals for the expansion of the conditions under which one can access a safe abortion and streamlined revised administrative procedures for more efficient handling of reports of rape and the granting of an abortion order.","PeriodicalId":44530,"journal":{"name":"AGENDA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGENDA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2022.2128836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract Abortion remains highly contested in Zimbabwe and this stems from deeply rooted and set convictions based on religious, traditional, cultural, and moralistic persuasions. Political will to commit to unrestricted conditions for abortions also remains very limited as evidenced by the continued hesitancy to review the 1977 Termination of Pregnancy Act (ToP) (Chapter 15:10) which allows for abortion under the circumstances of rape, incest and health. There have been concerted efforts to engage in advocacy campaigns for the review of the ToP to allow for more liberal conditions and this has seen feminists coming together to influence various constituencies. Advocacy efforts have centred on conducting a multi-lane approach comprised of Values Clarification Attitudes and Transformation exercises with traditional leaders, Parliamentarians, religious and cultural leaders; engagement with Ministries of Justice, Health, Education; media engagement of feminist reporters for informed and transformative reporting on abortion, and linking with global campaigns for ongoing learnings. To date, the advocacy has resulted in the abortion agenda being discussed in Parliament and there is evidence of more progressive attitudes by gate keepers and opinion leaders. Draft regulations and a new ToP Bill have been developed by the feminist advocates, both of which have been submitted to Ministry of Justice for adoption. Contained within these are proposals for the expansion of the conditions under which one can access a safe abortion and streamlined revised administrative procedures for more efficient handling of reports of rape and the granting of an abortion order.
“为全面的SRHR解锁安全空间”:倡导津巴布韦妇女和少女获得安全堕胎的权利
堕胎在津巴布韦仍然备受争议,这源于根深蒂固的、基于宗教、传统、文化和道德信念的信念。承诺不受限制的堕胎条件的政治意愿仍然非常有限,这可以从1977年《终止妊娠法》(第15章10节)的审查继续犹豫不决中得到证明,该法允许在强奸、乱伦和健康的情况下堕胎。人们一致努力开展宣传运动,要求对《最高纲领》进行审查,以允许更自由的条件,这使得女权主义者聚集在一起,影响各个选区。宣传工作的重点是采取多途径办法,包括与传统领袖、议员、宗教和文化领袖进行价值澄清、态度和转变活动;与司法部、卫生部、教育部合作;女权主义记者在媒体上的参与,对堕胎进行知情和变革性的报道,并与不断学习的全球运动联系起来。迄今为止,这种倡导已导致议会讨论堕胎议程,有证据表明,看门人和舆论领袖的态度更加进步。女权主义倡导者制定了条例草案和一项新的ToP法案,这两项草案都已提交司法部通过。这些建议包括扩大安全堕胎的条件,精简经修订的行政程序,以便更有效地处理强奸报告和签发堕胎令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AGENDA
AGENDA POETRY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信