A cross sectional study into the use of YouTube™ as a source of patient education in orthodontic treatment risks

C. Hutchison, Fatima A. Elmahgoub, V. Cave
{"title":"A cross sectional study into the use of YouTube™ as a source of patient education in orthodontic treatment risks","authors":"C. Hutchison, Fatima A. Elmahgoub, V. Cave","doi":"10.3126/OJN.V10I3.35489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To investigate the quality of information offered by videos on YouTube™ for those individuals seeking information regarding risks associated with orthodontic treatment. The quality of information was compared the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) patient information leaflet ‘Orthodontic treatment- what are the risks’. \nMaterials and Method: YouTube™ was searched systematically for videos on orthodontic treatment risks using the terms ‘orthodontic risks’ and ‘braces risks’. Videos were selected based on a strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and demographics recorded. Completeness was assessed using a 8-point score based on the BOS patient information leaflet ‘Orthodontic treatment- what are the risks’. Descriptive statistics and statistical analysis using correlation tests were generated. \nResult: 19.2% videos met the specified criteria with 80.8% videos excluded. Videos varied in regards to completeness with the mean completeness score of 3 and only 13% meeting all criteria. The risk of pain and discomfort was most commonly included orthodontic risk 61%. No statistical significance was found for completeness of the video with viewers interaction (R = 0.2665, P=0.219897) viewing rate (R=0.1138, P=0.617326) or length of video (R=0.0062, P= 0.977601). \nConclusion: YouTube™ generally hosts videos with low completeness with regards to orthodontic treatment risks. Therefore, orthodontists should be aware of this resource and caution patients regarding the comprehensiveness of information. In addition to the potentially misleading content which is avail-able within YouTube™ videos","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":"10 1","pages":"31-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/OJN.V10I3.35489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the quality of information offered by videos on YouTube™ for those individuals seeking information regarding risks associated with orthodontic treatment. The quality of information was compared the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) patient information leaflet ‘Orthodontic treatment- what are the risks’. Materials and Method: YouTube™ was searched systematically for videos on orthodontic treatment risks using the terms ‘orthodontic risks’ and ‘braces risks’. Videos were selected based on a strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and demographics recorded. Completeness was assessed using a 8-point score based on the BOS patient information leaflet ‘Orthodontic treatment- what are the risks’. Descriptive statistics and statistical analysis using correlation tests were generated. Result: 19.2% videos met the specified criteria with 80.8% videos excluded. Videos varied in regards to completeness with the mean completeness score of 3 and only 13% meeting all criteria. The risk of pain and discomfort was most commonly included orthodontic risk 61%. No statistical significance was found for completeness of the video with viewers interaction (R = 0.2665, P=0.219897) viewing rate (R=0.1138, P=0.617326) or length of video (R=0.0062, P= 0.977601). Conclusion: YouTube™ generally hosts videos with low completeness with regards to orthodontic treatment risks. Therefore, orthodontists should be aware of this resource and caution patients regarding the comprehensiveness of information. In addition to the potentially misleading content which is avail-able within YouTube™ videos
对YouTube使用情况的横断面研究™ 作为正畸治疗风险患者教育的来源
简介:调查YouTube上视频提供的信息质量™ 对于那些寻求与正畸治疗相关的风险信息的个人。英国正畸学会(BOS)的患者信息传单“正畸治疗-风险是什么”对信息质量进行了比较。材料和方法:YouTube™ 使用术语“正畸风险”和“牙套风险”系统地搜索了关于正畸治疗风险的视频。视频是根据严格的入选和排除标准以及记录的人口统计数据选择的。根据BOS患者信息传单“正畸治疗-风险是什么”,使用8分来评估完整性。生成描述性统计和使用相关检验的统计分析。结果:19.2%的视频符合指定标准,80.8%的视频被排除在外。视频的完整性各不相同,平均完整性得分为3,只有13%符合所有标准。疼痛和不适的风险最常见,包括61%的正畸风险。视频的完整性与观众互动(R=0.2665,P=0.219897)、观看率(R=0.1138,P=0.617326)或视频长度(R=0.0062,P=0.977601)没有统计学意义。结论:YouTube™ 通常主持关于正畸治疗风险的完整性较低的视频。因此,正畸医生应该意识到这一资源,并提醒患者注意信息的全面性。除了YouTube中可能存在的误导性内容外™ 视频
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书