Afterlives: Shelley’s Transformative Rhetoric in Queen Mab Note 17

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 POETRY

KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09524142.2023.2215064

Z. Varga

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The essay discusses the scope of Percy Bysshe Shelley’s transformative rhetoric centred around the body and its potentially revolutionary transformation within the nature/culture landscape, especially through the discourse on vegetarian diet. The topic of the essay is explored through work by Timothy Morton on Shelley’s vegetarianism and also on ‘dark ecology’, trying to juxtapose the concept of diet on the one side, and the idea of ecological awareness on the other side with revolutionary/reformist intentions inscribed in Shelley’s transformative rhetoric of his vegetarian discourse. The main focus of the essay is Shelley’s A Vindication of Natural Diet as part of lengthy notes for Queen Mab (printed in 1813), close read as the part of the whole textual body within which it appears. The topic of the essay is explored through the reception of Shelley’s poetry in the context of ecocriticism trying to address contemporary ecological issues and its reminiscences within Western civilization.

查看原文本刊更多论文

《余生》：梅女王笔记17中雪莱的转换修辞

摘要本文讨论了珀西·比西·雪莱以身体为中心的变革性修辞的范围，以及它在自然/文化景观中潜在的革命性转变，特别是通过素食的话语。这篇文章的主题是通过蒂莫西·莫顿关于雪莱素食主义和“黑暗生态”的作品来探讨的，试图将一方面的饮食概念和另一方面的生态意识与雪莱素食话语的变革修辞中所包含的革命/改良意图并置。这篇文章的主要焦点是雪莱的《自然饮食的辩护》，这是为梅布女王写的长篇笔记的一部分（1813年印刷），细读是它出现的整个文本的一部分。本文的主题是通过在生态批评的背景下接受雪莱的诗歌来探讨的，试图解决当代生态问题及其在西方文明中的回忆。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW POETRY-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.