The Eneolithic cemetery at Khvalynsk on the Volga River

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
D. Anthony, A. Khokhlov, S. A. Agapov, D. Agapov, R. Schulting, I. Olalde, D. Reich
{"title":"The Eneolithic cemetery at Khvalynsk on the Volga River","authors":"D. Anthony, A. Khokhlov, S. A. Agapov, D. Agapov, R. Schulting, I. Olalde, D. Reich","doi":"10.1515/pz-2022-2034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The genetically attested migrations of the third millennium BC have made the origins and nature of the Yamnaya culture a question of broad relevance across northern Eurasia. But none of the key archaeological sites most important for understanding the evolution of Yamnaya culture is published in western languages. These key sites include the fifth-millennium BC Khvalynsk cemetery in the middle Volga steppes. When the first part of the Eneolithic cemetery (Khvalynsk I) was discovered in 1977–1979, the graves displayed many material and ritual traits that were quickly recognized as similar and probably ancestral to Yamnaya customs, but without the Yamnaya kurgans. With the discovery of a second burial plot (Khvalynsk II) 120 m to the south in 1987–1988, Khvalynsk became the largest excavated Eneolithic cemetery in the Don-Volga-Ural steppes (201 recorded graves), dated about 4500–4300 BCE. It has the largest copper assemblage of the fifth millennium BC in the steppes (373 objects) and the largest assemblage of sacrificed domesticated animals (at least 106 sheep-goat, 29 cattle, and 16 horses); and it produced four polished stone maces from well-documented grave contexts. The human skeletons have been sampled extensively for ancient DNA, the basis for an analysis of family relationships. This report compiles information from the relevant Russian-language publications and from the archaeologists who excavated the site, two of whom are co-authors, about the history of excavations, radiocarbon dates, copper finds, domesticated animal sacrifices, polished stone maces, genetic and skeletal studies, and relationships with other steppe cultures as well as agricultural cultures of the North Caucasus (Svobodnoe-Meshoko) and southeastern Europe (Varna and Cucuteni-Tripol’ye B1). Khvalynsk is described as a coalescent culture, integrating and combining northern and southern elements, a hybrid that can be recognized genetically, in cranio-facial types, in exchanged artifacts, and in social segments within the cemetery. Stone maces symbolized the unification and integration of socially defined segments at Khvalynsk.","PeriodicalId":44421,"journal":{"name":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","volume":"97 1","pages":"22 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2022-2034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The genetically attested migrations of the third millennium BC have made the origins and nature of the Yamnaya culture a question of broad relevance across northern Eurasia. But none of the key archaeological sites most important for understanding the evolution of Yamnaya culture is published in western languages. These key sites include the fifth-millennium BC Khvalynsk cemetery in the middle Volga steppes. When the first part of the Eneolithic cemetery (Khvalynsk I) was discovered in 1977–1979, the graves displayed many material and ritual traits that were quickly recognized as similar and probably ancestral to Yamnaya customs, but without the Yamnaya kurgans. With the discovery of a second burial plot (Khvalynsk II) 120 m to the south in 1987–1988, Khvalynsk became the largest excavated Eneolithic cemetery in the Don-Volga-Ural steppes (201 recorded graves), dated about 4500–4300 BCE. It has the largest copper assemblage of the fifth millennium BC in the steppes (373 objects) and the largest assemblage of sacrificed domesticated animals (at least 106 sheep-goat, 29 cattle, and 16 horses); and it produced four polished stone maces from well-documented grave contexts. The human skeletons have been sampled extensively for ancient DNA, the basis for an analysis of family relationships. This report compiles information from the relevant Russian-language publications and from the archaeologists who excavated the site, two of whom are co-authors, about the history of excavations, radiocarbon dates, copper finds, domesticated animal sacrifices, polished stone maces, genetic and skeletal studies, and relationships with other steppe cultures as well as agricultural cultures of the North Caucasus (Svobodnoe-Meshoko) and southeastern Europe (Varna and Cucuteni-Tripol’ye B1). Khvalynsk is described as a coalescent culture, integrating and combining northern and southern elements, a hybrid that can be recognized genetically, in cranio-facial types, in exchanged artifacts, and in social segments within the cemetery. Stone maces symbolized the unification and integration of socially defined segments at Khvalynsk.
伏尔加河畔赫瓦林斯克的Eneolitic墓地
公元前第三个千年的遗传证明的迁徙使亚姆纳亚文化的起源和性质成为欧亚大陆北部广泛相关的问题。但是,对了解亚姆纳亚文化演变最重要的关键考古遗址,没有一个是用西方语言出版的。这些重要遗址包括伏尔加草原中部公元前五千年的赫瓦连斯克墓地。1977年至1979年发现新石器时代墓地的第一部分(赫瓦林斯克一号)时,这些坟墓显示出许多物质和仪式特征,很快被认为与亚姆纳亚习俗相似,可能是亚姆纳亚习俗的祖先,但没有亚姆纳亚库尔干人。1987年至1988年,在向南120米的地方发现了第二个墓地(Khvalynsk II),使Khvalynsk成为了伏尔加-乌拉尔大草原上最大的新石器时代墓地(201个有记录的坟墓),大约在公元前4500-4300年。它拥有公元前五千年草原上最大的铜制品(373件)和最大的家畜祭祀制品(至少106只绵羊山羊、29头牛和16匹马);从有详细记录的墓葬中发现了四把抛光过的石制狼牙棒。这些人类骨骼被广泛取样,以获取古代DNA,这是分析家族关系的基础。这份报告汇编了来自相关俄语出版物和挖掘该遗址的考古学家(其中两位是共同作者)的信息,内容涉及挖掘历史、放射性碳年代测定、铜发现、驯养动物献祭、抛光石制钉、遗传和骨骼研究,以及与北高加索(Svobodnoe-Meshoko)和东南欧(瓦尔纳和库库特尼-特里波尔耶B1)的其他草原文化和农业文化的关系。赫瓦林斯克被描述为一种融合文化,融合并结合了北方和南方的元素,一种可以在基因上识别的混合体,在颅面类型,在交换的文物中,在墓地的社会阶层中。石制权杖象征着在赫瓦连斯克社会界定的部分的统一和整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Praehistorische Zeitschrift is regarded as one of the most renowned German publications in the area of Prehistory and Ancient History. In keeping with its traditional mission, it presents detailed accounts of the most recent research conducted in Europe. The geographical emphasis is placed on Eastern, South-Eastern and Northern Central Europe. A comprehensive review section deals with recent German and international monographs from the field of prehistoric archaeology. Contributions are published in German, English or French, with a brief abstract in the other two languages; if necessary, a summary is provided in the author"s native language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信