Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the ketosteroid receptors: an in silico risk assessment approach

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
M. F. Khan, M. Alam, G. Verma, W. Akhtar, M. Rizvi, Asif Ali, M. Akhter, M. Shaquiquzzaman
{"title":"Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the ketosteroid receptors: an in silico risk assessment approach","authors":"M. F. Khan, M. Alam, G. Verma, W. Akhtar, M. Rizvi, Asif Ali, M. Akhter, M. Shaquiquzzaman","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2016.1273423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) are the ones with poor water solubility and low volatility, resistant to physical, chemical and biological processes, persistent in the environment even under extreme conditions. Due to lipophilic nature, they get adhered to the fatty material and concentrate through biomagnification and bioaccumulation, thereby easily getting incorporated into food chains, paving the way to endocrine disruption via modulation of various human receptors. This in turn leads to certain adverse health effects. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken and their binding pattern was assessed with the ketosteroid receptors, i.e. androgen (hAR), glucocorticoid (hGR), progesterone (hPR) and mineralocorticoid (hMR) in comparison to the corresponding natural steroids and a known endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, Bisphenol A (BPA). Most of the DLCs, particularly those bearing hydroxyl (-OH) group showed considerable affinities with ketosteroid receptors. On comparing D scores of all the dioxins and DLCs against all four receptors, compound 8-hydroxy-3,4-dichlorodibenzofuran(8-OH-DCDF) exhibited least D score of -9.549 kcal mol−1 against hAR. 3,8-Dihydroxy-2-chlorodibenzofuran(3,8-DiOH-CDF), 4′-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrachlorobiphenyl (4′-OH-TCB) and 4-hydroxy-2,2′,5′-trichlorobiphenyl(4-OH-TCB) also showed comparable molecular interactions with the ketosteroid receptors. These interactions mainly include H-bonding, π–π stacking, hydrophobic, polar and van der Waals’ interactions. In contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptors than certain DLCs reported herein, i.e. certain DLCs might be more toxic than the proven toxic agent, BPA. Such studies play a pivotal role in the risk assessment of exposure to dioxins and DLCs on human health.","PeriodicalId":49117,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15376516.2016.1273423","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2016.1273423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) are the ones with poor water solubility and low volatility, resistant to physical, chemical and biological processes, persistent in the environment even under extreme conditions. Due to lipophilic nature, they get adhered to the fatty material and concentrate through biomagnification and bioaccumulation, thereby easily getting incorporated into food chains, paving the way to endocrine disruption via modulation of various human receptors. This in turn leads to certain adverse health effects. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken and their binding pattern was assessed with the ketosteroid receptors, i.e. androgen (hAR), glucocorticoid (hGR), progesterone (hPR) and mineralocorticoid (hMR) in comparison to the corresponding natural steroids and a known endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, Bisphenol A (BPA). Most of the DLCs, particularly those bearing hydroxyl (-OH) group showed considerable affinities with ketosteroid receptors. On comparing D scores of all the dioxins and DLCs against all four receptors, compound 8-hydroxy-3,4-dichlorodibenzofuran(8-OH-DCDF) exhibited least D score of -9.549 kcal mol−1 against hAR. 3,8-Dihydroxy-2-chlorodibenzofuran(3,8-DiOH-CDF), 4′-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrachlorobiphenyl (4′-OH-TCB) and 4-hydroxy-2,2′,5′-trichlorobiphenyl(4-OH-TCB) also showed comparable molecular interactions with the ketosteroid receptors. These interactions mainly include H-bonding, π–π stacking, hydrophobic, polar and van der Waals’ interactions. In contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptors than certain DLCs reported herein, i.e. certain DLCs might be more toxic than the proven toxic agent, BPA. Such studies play a pivotal role in the risk assessment of exposure to dioxins and DLCs on human health.
二恶英和dlc与酮类固醇受体的分子相互作用:一种计算机风险评估方法
摘要二恶英和类二恶英化合物(DLCs)是指水溶性差、挥发性低、耐物理、化学和生物过程、即使在极端条件下也能在环境中持久存在的化合物。由于亲脂性,它们粘附在脂肪物质上,并通过生物放大和生物积累而浓缩,从而很容易融入食物链,为通过调节各种人类受体破坏内分泌铺平了道路。这反过来又会导致某些不利的健康影响。在本研究中,共采集了100种二恶英和DLC,并与相应的天然类固醇和已知的内分泌干扰外源性物质双酚a(BPA)相比,用酮体类固醇受体,即雄激素(hAR)、糖皮质激素(hGR)、孕酮(hPR)和盐皮质激素(hMR)评估了它们的结合模式。大多数DLC,特别是那些带有羟基(-OH)基团的DLC,显示出与酮甾体受体相当大的亲和力。在比较所有二恶英和DLC对所有四种受体的D评分时,化合物8-羟基-3,4-二氯二苯并呋喃(8-OH-DCDF)表现出-9.549的最小D评分 kcal mol−1对抗hAR。3,8-二羟基-2-氯二苯并呋喃(3,8-DiOH-CDF)、4′-羟基-2,3,4,5-四氯联苯(4′-OH-TCB)和4-羟基-2,2′,5′-三氯联苯(4-OH-TCB)也显示出与酮甾受体相当的分子相互作用。这些相互作用主要包括氢键、π–π堆积、疏水性、极性和范德华相互作用。相反,本研究中测试的BPA和一些天然配体与这些受体的结合亲和力低于本文报道的某些DLC,即某些DLC可能比已证实的毒性剂BPA毒性更大。此类研究在接触二恶英和DLC对人类健康的风险评估中发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信