Urological Cancer Treatment by a Multidisciplinary Team throughout the Covid-19 Pandemic: What Have We Learned?

Julián Chavarriaga, J. Cataño, J. Villanueva, Daniel Sáenz, Daniel Suso-Palau, S. Rodríguez, Catalina Villaquirán, J. Galvis, P. Pinilla, A. Morales, German Patiño
{"title":"Urological Cancer Treatment by a Multidisciplinary Team throughout the Covid-19 Pandemic: What Have We Learned?","authors":"Julián Chavarriaga, J. Cataño, J. Villanueva, Daniel Sáenz, Daniel Suso-Palau, S. Rodríguez, Catalina Villaquirán, J. Galvis, P. Pinilla, A. Morales, German Patiño","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction It is known that cancer care is best approached by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This became specifically true in the Covid-19 pandemic in which choices for urological cancer treatment are influenced by many factors. In some cases, delayed treatment may have consequences regarding the patient's oncological outcomes. The aim of the present article is to report our experience throughout the Covid-19 pandemic treating patients with urological neoplasms at a high-volume center. Methods We used a convenience sampling method. Cases were evaluated and discussed on an individual basis at the MDT meetings, and, after a consensus regarding delaying or scheduling treatment, patients were scheduled according to the risk of postponing the procedures. The Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) scoring system was measured in each patient; all patients answered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Covid-19 self-screening questionnaire prior to surgery. The Covid-19-free survival rate was estimated. Results A total of 194 patients were assessed by the multidisciplinary team and finally treated, with median follow-up of 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.75 to 6) months. Only two patients had Covid-19 confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In total, 54 patients underwent oncological surgery, 129 were treated with radiotherapy, and 11 were treated with intravenous chemotherapy. The median age was 66 years (IQR: 59 to 94 years), and the median MeNTS score in the surgically-treated cohort was 35 points (IQR: 31 to 47 points). Conclusions The evaluation and treatment of urological cancer should be conducted by an MDT; this is of utmost importance, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data collected in our institution showed that most patients could be safely treated by taking all necessary precautions and discussing each case individually in the MDT meetings and performing a close follow-up.","PeriodicalId":38070,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Colombiana","volume":"30 1","pages":"e210 - e216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Colombiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction It is known that cancer care is best approached by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This became specifically true in the Covid-19 pandemic in which choices for urological cancer treatment are influenced by many factors. In some cases, delayed treatment may have consequences regarding the patient's oncological outcomes. The aim of the present article is to report our experience throughout the Covid-19 pandemic treating patients with urological neoplasms at a high-volume center. Methods We used a convenience sampling method. Cases were evaluated and discussed on an individual basis at the MDT meetings, and, after a consensus regarding delaying or scheduling treatment, patients were scheduled according to the risk of postponing the procedures. The Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) scoring system was measured in each patient; all patients answered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Covid-19 self-screening questionnaire prior to surgery. The Covid-19-free survival rate was estimated. Results A total of 194 patients were assessed by the multidisciplinary team and finally treated, with median follow-up of 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.75 to 6) months. Only two patients had Covid-19 confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In total, 54 patients underwent oncological surgery, 129 were treated with radiotherapy, and 11 were treated with intravenous chemotherapy. The median age was 66 years (IQR: 59 to 94 years), and the median MeNTS score in the surgically-treated cohort was 35 points (IQR: 31 to 47 points). Conclusions The evaluation and treatment of urological cancer should be conducted by an MDT; this is of utmost importance, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data collected in our institution showed that most patients could be safely treated by taking all necessary precautions and discussing each case individually in the MDT meetings and performing a close follow-up.
新冠肺炎大流行期间多学科团队的泌尿外科癌症治疗:我们学到了什么?
摘要简介 众所周知,癌症治疗最好由多学科团队(MDT)进行。这在新冠肺炎大流行中尤其如此,在这场大流行中,泌尿外科癌症治疗的选择受到许多因素的影响。在某些情况下,延迟治疗可能会对患者的肿瘤学结果产生影响。本文的目的是报告我们在新冠肺炎大流行期间在高容量中心治疗泌尿系统肿瘤患者的经验。方法 我们使用了一种方便的抽样方法。在MDT会议上对病例进行了单独评估和讨论,在就推迟或安排治疗达成共识后,根据推迟手术的风险安排患者。测量每位患者的医学必要性、时间敏感性(MeNTS)评分系统;所有患者在手术前回答了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)新冠肺炎自我筛查问卷。估计了无新冠肺炎的存活率。后果 多学科团队共对194名患者进行了评估并最终进行了治疗,中位随访时间为4个月(四分位间距[IQR]:2.75至6)。只有两名患者通过实时聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)确诊了新冠肺炎。总共有54名患者接受了肿瘤手术,129人接受了放射治疗,11人接受了静脉化疗。中位年龄为66岁(IQR:59-94岁),手术治疗队列中MeNTS的中位得分为35分(IQR:31-47分)。结论 泌尿外科癌症的评估和治疗应通过MDT进行;这一点至关重要,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行期间。我们机构收集的数据表明,通过采取一切必要的预防措施,在MDT会议上单独讨论每个病例并进行密切随访,大多数患者都可以得到安全的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Colombiana
Urologia Colombiana Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Urología Colombiana is the serial scientific publication of the Colombian Society of Urology at intervals of three issues per year, in which the results of original research, review articles and other research designs that contribute to increase knowledge in medicine and particularly in the specialty of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信