Puncture miniinvasive methods of surgical treatment of primary varicoses of the superficial veins of the lower extremities c2-c6s

V. Shaprynskyi, N. Semenenko
{"title":"Puncture miniinvasive methods of surgical treatment of primary varicoses of the superficial veins of the lower extremities c2-c6s","authors":"V. Shaprynskyi, N. Semenenko","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.1(23).2023.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Treatment results of primary varicose disorders has been shown in article. The experience of using of thermal (endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation) and non-thermal methods (endovenous mechanochemical ablation, echo-controlled introduction of bioglue) in treatment of stage C2-С6 chronic venous is shown. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of endovenous ablation techniques. The treatment of 218 patients was analyzed. In the group of patients who underwent EVLA, reflux was detected in 2 cases at the follow-up after week. In our opinion, this is due to insufficient exposure of the laser irradiation using a single-ring type of light guide. To correct the detected reflux, a single injection of foam scleroterapy. Foam form (3%) was used. In the group of patients after RFA, inflow reflux was detected in 1 patient (5.2%), in other cases complete obliteration was observed (17 patients - 89.4%). In the group of patients with mechanochemical obliteration, recanalization was determined in 5 patients (19.2%) with control ultrasound after 1 month. It was corrected by carrying out the procedure of foam scleroobliteration. In the group of patients with the cyanoacrylate obliteration, inflow reflux was detected in 2 patients (14.2%) on examination after 1 month. The received results lead to conclusion, that endovenous laser coagulation of affected veins is a more reliable method of threatment and the gold standard. The advantage of non-thermal methods is the absence of thermal effects on the paravenous structures, respectively, patients have no pain during the procedure, increases comfort, and there is no risk of damage to the paravenous nerves. Another advantage of non-thermal techniques is no need to use of tumescent anesthesia, since only one puncture is required for the operation, which is comfortable for patients. The use of adhesive vein obliteration is justified in patients with signs of a short reflux duration and has an advantage for the patient due to the absence of the need for compression in the postoperative period. In our study, foam sclerotherapy was the method of choice for treatment correction, if necessary.","PeriodicalId":34164,"journal":{"name":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinichna ta profilaktichna meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.1(23).2023.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Treatment results of primary varicose disorders has been shown in article. The experience of using of thermal (endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation) and non-thermal methods (endovenous mechanochemical ablation, echo-controlled introduction of bioglue) in treatment of stage C2-С6 chronic venous is shown. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of endovenous ablation techniques. The treatment of 218 patients was analyzed. In the group of patients who underwent EVLA, reflux was detected in 2 cases at the follow-up after week. In our opinion, this is due to insufficient exposure of the laser irradiation using a single-ring type of light guide. To correct the detected reflux, a single injection of foam scleroterapy. Foam form (3%) was used. In the group of patients after RFA, inflow reflux was detected in 1 patient (5.2%), in other cases complete obliteration was observed (17 patients - 89.4%). In the group of patients with mechanochemical obliteration, recanalization was determined in 5 patients (19.2%) with control ultrasound after 1 month. It was corrected by carrying out the procedure of foam scleroobliteration. In the group of patients with the cyanoacrylate obliteration, inflow reflux was detected in 2 patients (14.2%) on examination after 1 month. The received results lead to conclusion, that endovenous laser coagulation of affected veins is a more reliable method of threatment and the gold standard. The advantage of non-thermal methods is the absence of thermal effects on the paravenous structures, respectively, patients have no pain during the procedure, increases comfort, and there is no risk of damage to the paravenous nerves. Another advantage of non-thermal techniques is no need to use of tumescent anesthesia, since only one puncture is required for the operation, which is comfortable for patients. The use of adhesive vein obliteration is justified in patients with signs of a short reflux duration and has an advantage for the patient due to the absence of the need for compression in the postoperative period. In our study, foam sclerotherapy was the method of choice for treatment correction, if necessary.
微创穿刺治疗原发性下肢浅静脉曲张c2-c6s
摘要原发性静脉曲张疾病的治疗结果已在文章中显示。介绍了使用热(静脉内激光消融、射频消融)和非热(静脉内机械化学消融、回声控制引入生物胶)治疗C2期-С6慢性静脉的经验。本研究的目的是评估静脉内消融技术的有效性。对218例患者的治疗进行分析。在EVLA组中,2例患者在一周后的随访中发现反流。在我们看来,这是由于使用单环型光导的激光照射曝光不足。为了纠正检测到的反流,单次注射泡沫硬化疗法。泡沫形式(3%)。在RFA患者组中,1例(5.2%)出现流入反流,其余17例(89.4%)出现完全闭塞。机械化学闭塞组中,5例(19.2%)患者在1个月后通过对照超声确定再通。采用泡沫硬化法对其进行了修正。在氰基丙烯酸酯闭塞组中,2例患者(14.2%)在1个月后检查时发现流入反流。所得结果表明,静脉内激光凝固是一种较为可靠的威胁方法,也是一种金标准。非热方法的优点是对静脉结构没有热效应,患者在手术过程中没有疼痛,增加了舒适度,并且没有损伤静脉神经的风险。非热技术的另一个优点是不需要使用肿胀麻醉,因为手术只需要穿刺一次,这对患者来说是舒适的。在返流持续时间短的患者中使用粘连静脉闭塞是合理的,并且由于术后不需要压迫,对患者具有优势。在我们的研究中,如有必要,泡沫硬化疗法是治疗矫正的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信