{"title":"Karl Rahner’s Work on the Assumption of Mary into Heaven","authors":"M. F. Fischer","doi":"10.5840/philtheol2021715140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karl Rahner completed his in 1951 but did not receive permission to publish it from his Jesuit superiors. The work appeared in 2004, twenty years after Rahner’s death. This essay examines his work on the Assumption and the censors’ objections. Rahner’s publication of 1947, “On the Theology of Death,” was appended to the Marian treatise as an “excursus” but laid the foundation for the later work. Rahner interpreted the Assumption as an anticipation of the resurrection of the dead. This essay focuses on three speculations by Rahner: on the relation of the soul to the body, on the maturation of the soul after death, and on the final resurrection as the world’s transformation. The censors criticized Rahner’s theology of death as too speculative and his Mariology as too minimal. Yet ’s treatment of Mary as a sign of hope until the second coming vindicated Rahner.","PeriodicalId":82316,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy, theology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy, theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol2021715140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Karl Rahner completed his in 1951 but did not receive permission to publish it from his Jesuit superiors. The work appeared in 2004, twenty years after Rahner’s death. This essay examines his work on the Assumption and the censors’ objections. Rahner’s publication of 1947, “On the Theology of Death,” was appended to the Marian treatise as an “excursus” but laid the foundation for the later work. Rahner interpreted the Assumption as an anticipation of the resurrection of the dead. This essay focuses on three speculations by Rahner: on the relation of the soul to the body, on the maturation of the soul after death, and on the final resurrection as the world’s transformation. The censors criticized Rahner’s theology of death as too speculative and his Mariology as too minimal. Yet ’s treatment of Mary as a sign of hope until the second coming vindicated Rahner.
Karl Rahner于1951年完成了他的著作,但没有得到耶稣会上级的出版许可。这部作品出现在2004年,也就是Rahner去世20年后。本文考察了他在《假设》和审查者的反对意见方面的工作。1947年,Rahner出版了《论死亡神学》,作为“短途旅行”附在玛丽安的论文后面,但为后来的工作奠定了基础。Rahner将圣母升天解释为对死者复活的期待。本文着重论述了拉赫纳对灵魂与身体的关系、灵魂死后的成熟以及作为世界转变的最终复活的三种推测。审查人员批评Rahner的死亡神学过于投机,他的神学思想过于狭隘。然而,在第二次降临之前,玛丽被视为希望的象征,这证明了雷纳的清白。