Book Review: Popular Education in Timor-lest: Past and Present Experience by S. P. Urban, A. B. Da Silva, & I. V. Lisingen

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Cossa
{"title":"Book Review: Popular Education in Timor-lest: Past and Present Experience by S. P. Urban, A. B. Da Silva, & I. V. Lisingen","authors":"J. Cossa","doi":"10.1177/07417136211031527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"intellectual traditions all premised on the historical necessity of social change. But dealing with each of these questions, and the relations between them, requires that we contend with ideology, thus our theorization of this concept is crucial. A key contribution of Bannerji's work to adult education is to focus our attention not simply on the circulation or ‘consumption’ of ideology, but its production. Much as Marx asks us to move beyond the appearance of capitalism as the process of circulation and exchange and into the ‘hidden abode’ of production, Bannerji asks the same of us in discerning the ‘ideological condition’ of capitalist social relations. The production of ideology and specifically how ideology is produced, and reproduced, within human social relations in her key concerns. This focus allows her to embrace a praxis that is not oriented to only what we say and think, that is to consciousness, but to what we do and how we consciously live. In changing social relations, then, we can imagine how changes in consciousness may emerge, echoing Paula Allman's insistence on critical education as a revolutionary praxis generating pedagogical ‘glimpses’ of transformed social relations. Bannerji's work to elucidate the ideological condition of capitalist social relations emerges through her detailed engagement with social relations of racism, patriarchy, caste, class, and colonialism. Each chapter in this collection takes history, culture, and experience as starting points to unearth the production process of ideologies of social difference and their historical role in the development and expansion of capitalism. In this career spanning work, Bannerji demonstrates an unrelenting pursuit of what she terms the ‘false universalism’ of bourgeois liberal interests. This interrogation leads her towards generative critical engagements with ideas of multiculturalism and nationalism, coloniality and subaltern studies, the limits of capitalist democracy, and the politics of decolonization. A particularly critical intervention that spans across these chapters is Bannerji's theorization of culture as a crucial material site of study, intervention, and transformation. As an anti-racist and feminist Marxist scholar of profound depth, she fundamentally deepens and renews many aspects of critical, feminist, anti-racist, and Marxist theory that are necessary for the current and coming struggles for human emancipation in our world.","PeriodicalId":47287,"journal":{"name":"Adult Education Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adult Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211031527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

intellectual traditions all premised on the historical necessity of social change. But dealing with each of these questions, and the relations between them, requires that we contend with ideology, thus our theorization of this concept is crucial. A key contribution of Bannerji's work to adult education is to focus our attention not simply on the circulation or ‘consumption’ of ideology, but its production. Much as Marx asks us to move beyond the appearance of capitalism as the process of circulation and exchange and into the ‘hidden abode’ of production, Bannerji asks the same of us in discerning the ‘ideological condition’ of capitalist social relations. The production of ideology and specifically how ideology is produced, and reproduced, within human social relations in her key concerns. This focus allows her to embrace a praxis that is not oriented to only what we say and think, that is to consciousness, but to what we do and how we consciously live. In changing social relations, then, we can imagine how changes in consciousness may emerge, echoing Paula Allman's insistence on critical education as a revolutionary praxis generating pedagogical ‘glimpses’ of transformed social relations. Bannerji's work to elucidate the ideological condition of capitalist social relations emerges through her detailed engagement with social relations of racism, patriarchy, caste, class, and colonialism. Each chapter in this collection takes history, culture, and experience as starting points to unearth the production process of ideologies of social difference and their historical role in the development and expansion of capitalism. In this career spanning work, Bannerji demonstrates an unrelenting pursuit of what she terms the ‘false universalism’ of bourgeois liberal interests. This interrogation leads her towards generative critical engagements with ideas of multiculturalism and nationalism, coloniality and subaltern studies, the limits of capitalist democracy, and the politics of decolonization. A particularly critical intervention that spans across these chapters is Bannerji's theorization of culture as a crucial material site of study, intervention, and transformation. As an anti-racist and feminist Marxist scholar of profound depth, she fundamentally deepens and renews many aspects of critical, feminist, anti-racist, and Marxist theory that are necessary for the current and coming struggles for human emancipation in our world.
书评:《帝汶岛的大众教育:过去和现在的经验》,S.P.Urban、A.B.Da Silva和I.V.Lisingen著
知识传统都是以社会变革的历史必然性为前提的。但是,处理这些问题以及它们之间的关系,需要我们与意识形态作斗争,因此,我们对这一概念的理论化是至关重要的。Bannerji的工作对成人教育的一个关键贡献是让我们的注意力不只是集中在意识形态的流通或“消费”上,而是集中在它的生产上。正如马克思要求我们超越资本主义作为流通和交换过程的表象,进入生产的“隐蔽居所”一样,班纳吉也要求我们辨别资本主义社会关系的“意识形态条件”。意识形态的产生,特别是意识形态是如何在人类社会关系中产生和再生产的,是她主要关注的问题。这种专注使她能够接受一种实践,这种实践不仅以我们所说的和所想的为导向,也就是以意识为导向,而是以我们所做的和我们有意识地生活的方式为导向。因此,在改变社会关系的过程中,我们可以想象意识的变化是如何出现的,这与保拉·奥尔曼(Paula Allman)坚持认为批判教育是一种革命性的实践,它产生了对改变的社会关系的教学“一瞥”。班纳吉通过对种族主义、父权制、种姓、阶级和殖民主义等社会关系的详细研究,阐明了资本主义社会关系的意识形态状况。本书每一章都以历史、文化、经验为切入点,揭示社会差异意识形态的产生过程及其在资本主义发展和扩张中的历史作用。在这部跨越职业生涯的作品中,Bannerji展示了她对资产阶级自由主义利益的“虚假普遍主义”的不懈追求。这种质疑将她引向多元文化主义和民族主义、殖民主义和次等研究、资本主义民主的局限性以及非殖民化政治等思想的生成批判。在这些章节中,一个特别重要的介入是Bannerji将文化理论化,作为研究、干预和转变的重要物质场所。作为一位极具深度的反种族主义和女权主义马克思主义学者,她从根本上深化和更新了批判的、女权主义的、反种族主义的和马克思主义的理论的许多方面,这些方面对于我们当今世界和未来的人类解放斗争是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adult Education Quarterly
Adult Education Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Adult Education Quarterly (AEQ) is a scholarly refereed journal committed to advancing the understanding and practice of adult and continuing education. The journal strives to be inclusive in scope, addressing topics and issues of significance to scholars and practitioners concerned with diverse aspects of adult and continuing education. AEQ publishes research employing a variety of methods and approaches, including (but not limited to) survey research, experimental designs, case studies, ethnographic observations and interviews, grounded theory, phenomenology, historical investigations, and narrative inquiry as well as articles that address theoretical and philosophical issues pertinent to adult and continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信