Sustainability and 3D concrete printing: identifying a need for a more holistic approach to assessing environmental impacts

Kate Heywood, Paul Nicholas
{"title":"Sustainability and 3D concrete printing: identifying a need for a more holistic approach to assessing environmental impacts","authors":"Kate Heywood,&nbsp;Paul Nicholas","doi":"10.1007/s44223-023-00030-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to identify the current status of research in 3D concrete printing (3DCP), locate the sustainability considerations relevant to these trajectories, and to identify a gap in knowledge and future research challenge regarding the sustainability of 3DCP. To categorize the broad range of research topics within 3DCP, the paper introduces an assessment framework that subdivides this field into three sub-fields: material science, computational design, and structure and performance. Common sustainability considerations are identified for each of these sub-fields. As a result of this analysis, a lack of critical assessments on claims about the sustainability and environmental impacts of 3DCP is identified.</p><p>Our survey of literature, and its analysis via this framework, finds that whilst certain sustainability aspects are highlighted, other measures and considerations are skimmed over, or omitted. It is found that whilst material optimization and the ability to create formwork-free, complex forms is noted as a main argument for the implementation of 3DCP, this claim is largely unsupported by reference or reported outcomes, and the environmental impacts are often only briefly discussed. There is a clear need for a holistic view on the sustainability issues which surround 3DCP.</p><p>This paper further highlights the lack of comprehensive assessment tools and metrics for measuring the environmental impact of 3DCP and concludes that further research must be done to develop these tools, to allow architects to integrate 3DCP into sustainability-oriented design workflows. Our paper concludes that the development of these tools will lead to a more comprehensive understanding on the environmental sustainability of 3DCP, allowing research resources to be focused within each field to ensure 3DCP continues to develop in a sustainable way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72270,"journal":{"name":"Architectural intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44223-023-00030-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44223-023-00030-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the current status of research in 3D concrete printing (3DCP), locate the sustainability considerations relevant to these trajectories, and to identify a gap in knowledge and future research challenge regarding the sustainability of 3DCP. To categorize the broad range of research topics within 3DCP, the paper introduces an assessment framework that subdivides this field into three sub-fields: material science, computational design, and structure and performance. Common sustainability considerations are identified for each of these sub-fields. As a result of this analysis, a lack of critical assessments on claims about the sustainability and environmental impacts of 3DCP is identified.

Our survey of literature, and its analysis via this framework, finds that whilst certain sustainability aspects are highlighted, other measures and considerations are skimmed over, or omitted. It is found that whilst material optimization and the ability to create formwork-free, complex forms is noted as a main argument for the implementation of 3DCP, this claim is largely unsupported by reference or reported outcomes, and the environmental impacts are often only briefly discussed. There is a clear need for a holistic view on the sustainability issues which surround 3DCP.

This paper further highlights the lack of comprehensive assessment tools and metrics for measuring the environmental impact of 3DCP and concludes that further research must be done to develop these tools, to allow architects to integrate 3DCP into sustainability-oriented design workflows. Our paper concludes that the development of these tools will lead to a more comprehensive understanding on the environmental sustainability of 3DCP, allowing research resources to be focused within each field to ensure 3DCP continues to develop in a sustainable way.

可持续性和3D混凝土打印:确定需要更全面的方法来评估环境影响
本文旨在确定三维混凝土打印(3DCP)的研究现状,找出与这些轨迹相关的可持续性考虑因素,并找出有关三维混凝土打印可持续性的知识差距和未来研究挑战。为了对 3DCP 范围广泛的研究课题进行分类,本文引入了一个评估框架,将该领域细分为三个子领域:材料科学、计算设计以及结构和性能。每个子领域都确定了共同的可持续性考虑因素。通过分析,我们发现缺乏对 3DCP 的可持续性和环境影响的批判性评估。我们对文献的调查以及通过该框架进行的分析发现,虽然某些可持续性方面得到了强调,但其他措施和考虑因素却被略过或省略。我们发现,虽然材料优化和创建无模板复杂模板的能力被认为是实施 3DCP 的主要论据,但这种说法在很大程度上缺乏参考或报告结果的支持,而且对环境影响的讨论往往只是简短的。本文进一步强调了缺乏全面的评估工具和衡量标准来衡量 3DCP 对环境的影响,并得出结论:必须进一步研究开发这些工具,以便建筑师将 3DCP 整合到以可持续性为导向的设计工作流程中。我们的论文认为,这些工具的开发将使人们对 3DCP 的环境可持续性有更全面的了解,从而使研究资源集中在各个领域,确保 3DCP 以可持续的方式继续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信