Imperio romano, globalidad y localidad en la Periégesis de Pausanias

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Á. M. Leoni
{"title":"Imperio romano, globalidad y localidad en la Periégesis de Pausanias","authors":"Á. M. Leoni","doi":"10.14201/SHHA201836135163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper seeks to explore the relationship between globality and locality in Greece in the second century AD. In order to achieve that it is proposed a critical reading of Pausanias’ descriptions of his visits to three imperial Greek cities: Tegea, Patras, and Corinth. These three examples are considered as showing in a particularly clear way a disagreement between the author’s Hellenism, which is the universalist imaginary framework from which the local is visited and known in the Perigesis, and the memories, identities, and cult practices, which apparently are particularities of those local places. However, a deeper analysis allows us to notice that apparently particular phenomena are quite evident signs that the localities in which they are inserted are deeply traversed by the global phenomenon of the empire. It is sought here, then, to show how, although Pausanias wants discursively to erase from his work the imperial historical reality, this reality emerges in any case in his text because the empire itself has become a space of intense cultural exchange between global tendencies and local experiences.","PeriodicalId":40819,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/SHHA201836135163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The following paper seeks to explore the relationship between globality and locality in Greece in the second century AD. In order to achieve that it is proposed a critical reading of Pausanias’ descriptions of his visits to three imperial Greek cities: Tegea, Patras, and Corinth. These three examples are considered as showing in a particularly clear way a disagreement between the author’s Hellenism, which is the universalist imaginary framework from which the local is visited and known in the Perigesis, and the memories, identities, and cult practices, which apparently are particularities of those local places. However, a deeper analysis allows us to notice that apparently particular phenomena are quite evident signs that the localities in which they are inserted are deeply traversed by the global phenomenon of the empire. It is sought here, then, to show how, although Pausanias wants discursively to erase from his work the imperial historical reality, this reality emerges in any case in his text because the empire itself has become a space of intense cultural exchange between global tendencies and local experiences.
波萨尼亚时期的罗马帝国、全球化和地方性
本文旨在探讨公元二世纪希腊的全球性和局部性之间的关系。为了达到这个目的,我们提出了一种批判性的解读包萨尼亚关于他访问三个希腊帝国城市的描述:特吉亚,帕特雷和科林斯。这三个例子被认为以一种特别清晰的方式显示了作者的希腊文化之间的分歧,希腊文化是一种普遍主义的想象框架,在佩里西斯中,当地人被访问和认识,而记忆,身份和邪教活动,显然是这些地方的特殊性。然而,更深入的分析使我们注意到,表面上的特殊现象是相当明显的迹象,表明它们所插入的地方深受帝国的全球现象的影响。这是为了展示,尽管包萨尼亚想要从他的作品中抹去帝国的历史现实,但无论如何,这个现实在他的文本中出现了,因为帝国本身已经成为一个在全球趋势和地方经验之间进行激烈文化交流的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA is an annual journal in which the articles received will be evaluated by reviewers external to the journal through the double blind system. The Editorial Board, respectful of the intellectual freedom of the authors, will not modify the opinions and expressed by them, although it does not sympathize with them either. The Editorial Board of STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA will consider the publication of works of all kinds, provided that they demonstrate a high level of quality and deal with aspects related to the chronological period included within the scope of Ancient History, either because of the novelty of the subject, because of the different treatment more deep of a problem already identified in historiography, by the contribution of unknown data in relation to a determined historiographic question, or by the potential applications of a new or more refined methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信