Conceptual Landmarks Regarding the Right to Private Life

I. Butnaru
{"title":"Conceptual Landmarks Regarding the Right to Private Life","authors":"I. Butnaru","doi":"10.54481/sju.2022.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the attention paid in recent years to privacy, there is still no agreement on the exact meaning of the term. We believe that of all the fundamental rights, privacy is the most difficult category to define because of the specific aspects inherent to it. Nowadays, it is more and more difficult to protect privacy and, in particular, the privacy of information as a value. At the global level there are fears regarding the violation of privacy due to the increase in the power and speed of information technology. By virtue of them, it is absolutely necessary to develop and implement at the state level a viable mechanism for the protection of the right to privacy. Considering the evolution over time of the notion of privacy, as well as taking into account the sensitive connotations it carries, we could define the right to privacy as follows: „The right to private life is a right to individualism, which consists in the ability to live safe from the eyes of others, as well as the ability to establish and develop relationships with others”.","PeriodicalId":52793,"journal":{"name":"Studii Juridice Universitare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studii Juridice Universitare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.2022.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the attention paid in recent years to privacy, there is still no agreement on the exact meaning of the term. We believe that of all the fundamental rights, privacy is the most difficult category to define because of the specific aspects inherent to it. Nowadays, it is more and more difficult to protect privacy and, in particular, the privacy of information as a value. At the global level there are fears regarding the violation of privacy due to the increase in the power and speed of information technology. By virtue of them, it is absolutely necessary to develop and implement at the state level a viable mechanism for the protection of the right to privacy. Considering the evolution over time of the notion of privacy, as well as taking into account the sensitive connotations it carries, we could define the right to privacy as follows: „The right to private life is a right to individualism, which consists in the ability to live safe from the eyes of others, as well as the ability to establish and develop relationships with others”.
关于私生活权的概念性标志
尽管近年来人们关注隐私,但对这个词的确切含义仍然没有达成一致。我们认为,在所有基本权利中,隐私是最难定义的类别,因为它固有的特定方面。如今,保护隐私,尤其是信息隐私作为一种价值越来越困难。在全球范围内,由于信息技术的力量和速度的提高,人们担心隐私受到侵犯。因此,绝对有必要在国家一级制定和实施保护隐私权的可行机制。考虑到隐私概念随着时间的推移而演变,并考虑到它所携带的敏感含义,我们可以将隐私权定义如下:“私人生活权是个人主义的权利,包括在他人眼中安全生活的能力,以及与他人建立和发展关系的能力”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信