Engaging knowledge and the knower: Design considerations for emerging modes of academic staff development

Q3 Social Sciences
D. Gachago, Barbara Jones, E. Esambe, Sonwabo Jongile, E. Ivala
{"title":"Engaging knowledge and the knower: Design considerations for emerging modes of academic staff development","authors":"D. Gachago, Barbara Jones, E. Esambe, Sonwabo Jongile, E. Ivala","doi":"10.14426/cristal.v9isi.476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curriculum design is a complex undertaking that requires both epistemological and ontological work. While there is an increased need for academics to develop and strengthen their capacity to design curricula, particularly in the context of Universities of Technology, which have gone through an intense period of identity finding and re-curriculation, there is little support for academics involved in this kind of work. This paper reflects on four iterations of an academic staff development intervention aimed at supporting academics engaged in curriculum design and renewal, with a particular focus on designing flexible curricula. Using a learning design model along with eleven design considerations developed by Gachago, et al. (2020) for online academic staff development and Maton’s Legitimation Code Theory – in particular the dimension Specialization - we show how curriculum work and learning design is iterative, contextual and messy. Most importantly, it is relational and involves collective sense-making. We recommend that each context needs to be carefully considered when designing courses, both face-to-face and online, and design considerations (such as motivation, facilitation, structuredness, level of collaboration) impact strongly on participants’ engagement and consequently experiences.","PeriodicalId":36957,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v9isi.476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Curriculum design is a complex undertaking that requires both epistemological and ontological work. While there is an increased need for academics to develop and strengthen their capacity to design curricula, particularly in the context of Universities of Technology, which have gone through an intense period of identity finding and re-curriculation, there is little support for academics involved in this kind of work. This paper reflects on four iterations of an academic staff development intervention aimed at supporting academics engaged in curriculum design and renewal, with a particular focus on designing flexible curricula. Using a learning design model along with eleven design considerations developed by Gachago, et al. (2020) for online academic staff development and Maton’s Legitimation Code Theory – in particular the dimension Specialization - we show how curriculum work and learning design is iterative, contextual and messy. Most importantly, it is relational and involves collective sense-making. We recommend that each context needs to be carefully considered when designing courses, both face-to-face and online, and design considerations (such as motivation, facilitation, structuredness, level of collaboration) impact strongly on participants’ engagement and consequently experiences.
参与知识和知者:学术人员发展新模式的设计考虑
课程设计是一项复杂的工作,既需要认识论工作,也需要本体论工作。虽然越来越需要学者发展和加强他们设计课程的能力,特别是在科技大学的背景下,这些大学经历了一个寻找身份和重新安排课程的紧张时期,但对参与这类工作的学者的支持很少。本文反映了学术人员发展干预的四次迭代,旨在支持从事课程设计和更新的学者,特别关注设计灵活的课程。使用Gachago等人(2020)为在线学术人员发展和Maton的合法化代码理论(尤其是专业化维度)开发的学习设计模型以及11个设计考虑因素,我们展示了课程工作和学习设计是如何迭代的、情境化的和混乱的。最重要的是,它是相互关联的,涉及到集体的理解。我们建议在设计课程时,无论是面对面的还是在线的,每种情况都需要仔细考虑,设计考虑因素(如动机、促进、结构、协作水平)对参与者的参与和由此产生的体验有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书