What attributes of mandatory waste management policy can enhance the separation intention of residents in China? A behaviour choice experiment

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wei Li, Kexin Sun, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhihao Wang, Guomin Li
{"title":"What attributes of mandatory waste management policy can enhance the separation intention of residents in China? A behaviour choice experiment","authors":"Wei Li,&nbsp;Kexin Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoguang Liu,&nbsp;Zhihao Wang,&nbsp;Guomin Li","doi":"10.1007/s10163-023-01695-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is facing a severe waste siege. Notwithstanding the several years of mandatory policy implementation, the residents’ waste separation intention remains insignificantly enhanced. Consequently, it is urgent to theoretically answer the question of what type of mandatory policy is most effective. Thus, in the current research, we propose the mandatory policy as a combination of five attributes, that is, economic penalty, social penalty, supervision, charging, and community governance, and conduct a policy choice experiment with 354 participants. The results of the randomized conjoint analysis show that economic penalty, supervision, and community governance are influential determinants of separation intention. The mandatory policy has an interaction effect with auxiliary policies; specifically, community governance and supervision are more effective, while residents are also more willing to pay fines when a points redemption policy or a well-developed infrastructure system is present. The effect of mandatory policy also varies across residents. Females, highly educated, or high-income individuals are relatively more inclined to separate waste, while elders, renters, and residents who have lived in an environment for more than 20 years are less likely to separate. The results of the welfare gain analysis show that strengthening the penalty, supervision, and community governance are also helpful toward improving social welfare. In order for mandatory policies to work better, it is important to continuously improve community governance, raise the cost of violations, vigorously promote waste supervision, perfect the reward mechanism, and improve waste separation infrastructure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"25 4","pages":"2365 - 2380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-023-01695-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is facing a severe waste siege. Notwithstanding the several years of mandatory policy implementation, the residents’ waste separation intention remains insignificantly enhanced. Consequently, it is urgent to theoretically answer the question of what type of mandatory policy is most effective. Thus, in the current research, we propose the mandatory policy as a combination of five attributes, that is, economic penalty, social penalty, supervision, charging, and community governance, and conduct a policy choice experiment with 354 participants. The results of the randomized conjoint analysis show that economic penalty, supervision, and community governance are influential determinants of separation intention. The mandatory policy has an interaction effect with auxiliary policies; specifically, community governance and supervision are more effective, while residents are also more willing to pay fines when a points redemption policy or a well-developed infrastructure system is present. The effect of mandatory policy also varies across residents. Females, highly educated, or high-income individuals are relatively more inclined to separate waste, while elders, renters, and residents who have lived in an environment for more than 20 years are less likely to separate. The results of the welfare gain analysis show that strengthening the penalty, supervision, and community governance are also helpful toward improving social welfare. In order for mandatory policies to work better, it is important to continuously improve community governance, raise the cost of violations, vigorously promote waste supervision, perfect the reward mechanism, and improve waste separation infrastructure.

Abstract Image

强制性废物管理政策的哪些属性可以增强中国居民的分类意愿?行为选择实验
中国正面临严重的垃圾问题。尽管政策强制实施了几年,但居民的垃圾分类意愿仍然没有明显增强。因此,迫切需要从理论上回答什么样的强制性政策最有效的问题。因此,在本研究中,我们提出了强制性政策作为经济惩罚、社会惩罚、监管、收费和社区治理五个属性的组合,并对354名参与者进行了政策选择实验。随机联合分析结果表明,经济处罚、监管和社区治理是影响分离意愿的决定因素。强制性政策与辅助性政策具有交互作用;具体来说,社区治理和监督更有效,而当积分兑换政策或完善的基础设施系统存在时,居民也更愿意支付罚款。强制性政策的效果也因居民而异。女性、高学历或高收入人群相对更倾向于分类垃圾,而老年人、租房者和在一个环境中生活了20年以上的居民则不太可能分类。福利收益分析结果表明,加强惩罚、监督和社区治理也有助于提高社会福利。要使强制性政策更好地发挥作用,必须不断完善社区治理,提高违规成本,大力推进垃圾监管,完善奖励机制,完善垃圾分类基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信