Ecological and topological differentiation of biotopes in the Mountain Crimea

Yakov Didukh, Yu.V. Rosenblit
{"title":"Ecological and topological differentiation of biotopes in the Mountain Crimea","authors":"Yakov Didukh, Yu.V. Rosenblit","doi":"10.15407/ukrbotj79.04.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides results of the quantitative score assessment of environmental conditions of plant communities (biotopes) and comparative analysis of the topological (altitude) gradient of changes using the method of synphytoindication and the Mountain Crimean geobotanical zone as an example. Of the 126 biotopes listed for the Mountain Crimea, we selected for the analysis 68 forest, shrub, grassland and petrophytic types, reflecting the patterns of topological differentiation, i.e. β-coenotic diversity within five geobotanical regions and altitudinal zones of the southern and northern macroslopes. In the article, we highlight the specifics of the methodology of field research and data processing, based on geobotanical relevés entered into the database in the TURBOVEG software and selected ecological and coenotic profiles. At the next stage, we assessed the living conditions of the biotopes by applying modern methods and programs TWISPAN, STATISTICA-7. On the basis of key biotopes, we identified combinations within the altitude zones treated as mesocombinations and those within the macroslopes – as macrocombinations. In the article, distribution of biotopes by mesocombinations, macrocombinations and geobotanical regions is provided. The model ecological-coenotic profiles of each geobotanical region of shrub-forest and petrophytic-grass series were built showing distribution of biotopes and graphs of the indicators of major ecological factors. The regularities of altitude changes and the nature of correlation were established. For climatic factors (thermo-, cryoregime, humidity, and climate continentality), we calculated relevant indicators and coefficients used in climatology. The obtained data form the basis for assessing the differentiation of biotopes, comparative analysis of the ecological conditions and forecasting potential changes.","PeriodicalId":52835,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Botanical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Botanical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj79.04.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article provides results of the quantitative score assessment of environmental conditions of plant communities (biotopes) and comparative analysis of the topological (altitude) gradient of changes using the method of synphytoindication and the Mountain Crimean geobotanical zone as an example. Of the 126 biotopes listed for the Mountain Crimea, we selected for the analysis 68 forest, shrub, grassland and petrophytic types, reflecting the patterns of topological differentiation, i.e. β-coenotic diversity within five geobotanical regions and altitudinal zones of the southern and northern macroslopes. In the article, we highlight the specifics of the methodology of field research and data processing, based on geobotanical relevés entered into the database in the TURBOVEG software and selected ecological and coenotic profiles. At the next stage, we assessed the living conditions of the biotopes by applying modern methods and programs TWISPAN, STATISTICA-7. On the basis of key biotopes, we identified combinations within the altitude zones treated as mesocombinations and those within the macroslopes – as macrocombinations. In the article, distribution of biotopes by mesocombinations, macrocombinations and geobotanical regions is provided. The model ecological-coenotic profiles of each geobotanical region of shrub-forest and petrophytic-grass series were built showing distribution of biotopes and graphs of the indicators of major ecological factors. The regularities of altitude changes and the nature of correlation were established. For climatic factors (thermo-, cryoregime, humidity, and climate continentality), we calculated relevant indicators and coefficients used in climatology. The obtained data form the basis for assessing the differentiation of biotopes, comparative analysis of the ecological conditions and forecasting potential changes.
克里米亚山区生物生境的生态和拓扑分化
本文以克里米亚山地地理植物区为例,采用共生指示法对植物群落(生境)环境条件进行了定量评分评估,并对变化的拓扑(海拔)梯度进行了比较分析。在克里米亚山脉列出的126个生物位中,我们选择了68种森林、灌木、草原和岩生类型进行分析,反映了拓扑分化的模式,即在五个地理植物区和南部和北部宏观草原的海拔带内的β-共生多样性。在这篇文章中,我们强调了实地研究和数据处理方法的细节,基于在TURBOVEG软件中输入数据库的地理植物相关信息以及选定的生态和共生态概况。在下一阶段,我们通过应用现代方法和程序TWISSAN,STATISTICA-7来评估生物区的生活条件。在关键生物表位的基础上,我们确定了海拔带内的组合被视为中组合,而宏观组合内的组合则被视为大组合。本文提供了中组合、大组合和地植物区的生物表位分布。建立了灌木林和岩生草系列各地植物区的生态共生剖面模型,显示了生物位的分布和主要生态因子的指标图。建立了海拔变化的规律和相关性。对于气候因素(热、低温、湿度和气候大陆性),我们计算了气候学中使用的相关指标和系数。所获得的数据构成了评估生物位分化、比较分析生态条件和预测潜在变化的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信