Limitless Borderless Forgetfulness? Limiting the Geographical Reach of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’

Q2 Social Sciences
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2017-03-07 DOI:10.5617/OSLAW2567
D. Svantesson
{"title":"Limitless Borderless Forgetfulness? Limiting the Geographical Reach of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’","authors":"D. Svantesson","doi":"10.5617/OSLAW2567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Google Spain, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that, in certain circumstances, the operator of a search engine is obliged to remove search results from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person’s name. In respect of implementation of this “right to be forgotten” – or more accurately “right to delisting” – one of the most important issues relates to the geographical scope of the delisting; that is, once it is decided that certain search results should be delisted, what is the appropriate geographical scope of the delisting? Google is currently only delisting in relation to EU domains such as .es, .nl and .de. However, in sharp contrast, the EU’s Article 29 Working Party on data protection wants global blocking so as to ensure that EU law is not ‘circumvented’. This article canvasses the contours of this issue and attempts to advance its resolution by proposing a Model Code for Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Delisting. While the Model is presented in the EU context, it can easily be transplanted into other jurisdictions as well.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"116-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oslo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/OSLAW2567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In Google Spain, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that, in certain circumstances, the operator of a search engine is obliged to remove search results from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person’s name. In respect of implementation of this “right to be forgotten” – or more accurately “right to delisting” – one of the most important issues relates to the geographical scope of the delisting; that is, once it is decided that certain search results should be delisted, what is the appropriate geographical scope of the delisting? Google is currently only delisting in relation to EU domains such as .es, .nl and .de. However, in sharp contrast, the EU’s Article 29 Working Party on data protection wants global blocking so as to ensure that EU law is not ‘circumvented’. This article canvasses the contours of this issue and attempts to advance its resolution by proposing a Model Code for Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Delisting. While the Model is presented in the EU context, it can easily be transplanted into other jurisdictions as well.
无界的健忘?限制“被遗忘权”的地理范围
在谷歌西班牙案中,欧盟法院裁定,在某些情况下,搜索引擎的运营商有义务从根据人名进行搜索后显示的结果列表中删除搜索结果。在落实这一“被遗忘权”——或者更准确地说是“退市的权利”——方面,最重要的问题之一涉及退市的地理范围;也就是说,一旦决定将某些搜索结果退市,退市的适当地理范围是什么?谷歌目前只将.es、.nl和.de等欧盟域名除名。然而,与此形成鲜明对比的是,欧盟第29条数据保护工作组希望全球屏蔽,以确保欧盟法律不会被“规避”。本文探讨了这一问题的轮廓,并试图通过提出一项《确定退市权下的退市地理范围的示范准则》来推动解决这一问题。虽然《示范法》是在欧盟背景下提出的,但它也可以很容易地移植到其他司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oslo Law Review
Oslo Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信