A comparative review of decision support tools routinely used by selected transboundary River Basin Organisations

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
H. Bukhari, C. Brown
{"title":"A comparative review of decision support tools routinely used by selected transboundary River Basin Organisations","authors":"H. Bukhari, C. Brown","doi":"10.2989/16085914.2021.1976610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As human pressures on water resources increase, the data and decision support (DS) tools used in the governance, development and management of transboundary rivers are likely to become increasingly important. There are no universal, standardised selection processes or designs for these tools, and so it is up to individual River Basin Organisations (RBOs) to decide what to include in their capacities. This desktop study provides a broad comparative analysis of the suites of DS numerical modelling tools developed and utilised by five intergovernmental transboundary RBOs that advise their member states in the management of their shared water resources: the Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission; the Orange-Senqu River Commission; the Nile Basin Initiative; the Zambezi Watercourse Commission; and the Mekong River Commission. These DS tools were reviewed against the information required to enable the kinds of comprehensive assessments of proposed basin management and development plans defined in their respective agreements, which include not only hydrological parameters, but also environmental and social considerations. A review of the model development timelines showed that prior to 2000, little capacity existed in modelling of hydrological, ecosystem, and social components of the river, but that these gaps have been addressed in recent years.","PeriodicalId":7864,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Aquatic Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"318 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Aquatic Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2021.1976610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As human pressures on water resources increase, the data and decision support (DS) tools used in the governance, development and management of transboundary rivers are likely to become increasingly important. There are no universal, standardised selection processes or designs for these tools, and so it is up to individual River Basin Organisations (RBOs) to decide what to include in their capacities. This desktop study provides a broad comparative analysis of the suites of DS numerical modelling tools developed and utilised by five intergovernmental transboundary RBOs that advise their member states in the management of their shared water resources: the Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission; the Orange-Senqu River Commission; the Nile Basin Initiative; the Zambezi Watercourse Commission; and the Mekong River Commission. These DS tools were reviewed against the information required to enable the kinds of comprehensive assessments of proposed basin management and development plans defined in their respective agreements, which include not only hydrological parameters, but also environmental and social considerations. A review of the model development timelines showed that prior to 2000, little capacity existed in modelling of hydrological, ecosystem, and social components of the river, but that these gaps have been addressed in recent years.
选择跨界河流流域组织常规使用的决策支持工具的比较审查
随着人类对水资源的压力增加,用于治理、开发和管理跨界河流的数据和决策支持(DS)工具可能变得越来越重要。这些工具没有通用的、标准化的选择过程或设计,因此取决于各个流域组织(rbo)决定在他们的能力中包括什么。本桌面研究对五个政府间跨界区域组织开发和使用的DS数值模拟工具套件进行了广泛的比较分析,这些工具为其成员国管理共享水资源提供建议:永久奥卡万戈河流域水委员会;奥兰治-森曲河委员会;尼罗河流域倡议;赞比西水道委员会;以及湄公河委员会。对这些DS工具进行了审查,以便对各自协议中规定的拟议流域管理和开发计划进行全面评估,其中不仅包括水文参数,还包括环境和社会考虑因素。对模型开发时间表的回顾表明,在2000年之前,对河流的水文、生态系统和社会组成部分的建模能力很小,但近年来这些差距已经得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Aquatic Science
African Journal of Aquatic Science MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Aquatic Science is an international journal devoted to the study of the aquatic sciences, covering all African inland and estuarine waters. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original scientific papers and short articles in all the aquatic science fields including limnology, hydrobiology, ecology, conservation, biomonitoring, management, water quality, ecotoxicology, biological interactions, physical properties and human impacts on African aquatic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信