Women organising in fragility and conflict: lessons from the #BringBackOurGirls movement, Nigeria

Q1 Social Sciences
M. Atela, A. Ojebode, Racheal Makokha, M. Otieno, Tade Akin Aina
{"title":"Women organising in fragility and conflict: lessons from the #BringBackOurGirls movement, Nigeria","authors":"M. Atela, A. Ojebode, Racheal Makokha, M. Otieno, Tade Akin Aina","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2021.1979323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public protests, including women-led struggles, are increasingly gaining a foothold in many parts of the world in response to multiple crises and growing exclusion, in a context of fragility. In the global South, most public protests involve temporary, informal coalitions where people come together and participate in a one-off event. The fluid nature of political space makes sustaining protests elusive because of protest fatigue. Yet, the #BringBackOurGirls (#BBOG), a women-led movement, headed a long-term protest that focused on the rights of the girl child to education – a direct response to Boko Haram’s gendered terror tactics, in which girls were abducted, forced to abandon school, and get married. This article examines when and how movements crystallise into long-term programmes of action in fragile and conflict-affected societies where state–society relations are weak and government is considered to be unresponsive. We use the case of the #BBOG movement, one of Nigeria’s intense social media-driven and women-led action, to examine the mix of pressures it faced, its characteristics, and strategies in situations of fragility, conflict, and closed political spaces. We identify four key strategies that the #BBOG has deployed to keep members coming, garner international support and sympathy, keep pressure on the elite in a safe manner for the movement members, and ensure an independent funding regime for durability and impact. This article finds that #BBOG was able to navigate fragility and the closing civic space in Nigeria by challenging the failure of government to address insecurity in the country, transcending societal barriers including gender, religion, and political class, transnationalising their movement, self-funding, and using social media strategically.","PeriodicalId":35882,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2021.1979323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public protests, including women-led struggles, are increasingly gaining a foothold in many parts of the world in response to multiple crises and growing exclusion, in a context of fragility. In the global South, most public protests involve temporary, informal coalitions where people come together and participate in a one-off event. The fluid nature of political space makes sustaining protests elusive because of protest fatigue. Yet, the #BringBackOurGirls (#BBOG), a women-led movement, headed a long-term protest that focused on the rights of the girl child to education – a direct response to Boko Haram’s gendered terror tactics, in which girls were abducted, forced to abandon school, and get married. This article examines when and how movements crystallise into long-term programmes of action in fragile and conflict-affected societies where state–society relations are weak and government is considered to be unresponsive. We use the case of the #BBOG movement, one of Nigeria’s intense social media-driven and women-led action, to examine the mix of pressures it faced, its characteristics, and strategies in situations of fragility, conflict, and closed political spaces. We identify four key strategies that the #BBOG has deployed to keep members coming, garner international support and sympathy, keep pressure on the elite in a safe manner for the movement members, and ensure an independent funding regime for durability and impact. This article finds that #BBOG was able to navigate fragility and the closing civic space in Nigeria by challenging the failure of government to address insecurity in the country, transcending societal barriers including gender, religion, and political class, transnationalising their movement, self-funding, and using social media strategically.
妇女在脆弱和冲突中组织:尼日利亚#BringBackOurGirls运动的教训
摘要在脆弱的背景下,为了应对多重危机和日益严重的排斥,包括妇女领导的斗争在内的公众抗议活动正在世界许多地方越来越站稳脚跟。在全球南方,大多数公众抗议活动都涉及临时的非正式联盟,人们聚集在一起参加一次性活动。由于抗议疲劳,政治空间的流动性使得持续的抗议活动变得难以捉摸。然而,妇女领导的#BringBackOurGirls(#BBOG)领导了一场长期抗议活动,重点关注女童的受教育权利,这是对博科圣地性别恐怖策略的直接回应,在这种策略中,女孩被绑架、被迫辍学并结婚。这篇文章探讨了在国家与社会关系薄弱、政府被认为反应迟钝的脆弱和受冲突影响的社会中,运动何时以及如何具体化为长期行动纲领。我们以#BBOG运动为例,研究了它在脆弱、冲突和封闭政治空间的情况下所面临的压力、特点和策略的组合。我们确定了#BBOG部署的四个关键战略,以保持成员的参与,获得国际支持和同情,以安全的方式为运动成员向精英施压,并确保独立的资金制度具有持久性和影响力。这篇文章发现,#BBOG能够应对尼日利亚的脆弱性和日益封闭的公民空间,挑战政府未能解决该国的不安全问题,超越包括性别、宗教和政治阶层在内的社会障碍,将他们的运动跨国化,自筹资金,并战略性地使用社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gender and Development
Gender and Development Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1993, Gender & Development has aimed to promote, inspire, and support development policy and practice, which furthers the goal of equality between women and men. This journal has a readership in over 90 countries and uses clear accessible language. Each issue of Gender & Development focuses on a topic of key interest to all involved in promoting gender equality through development. An up-to-the minute overview of the topic is followed by a range of articles from researchers, policy makers, and practitioners. Insights from development initiatives across the world are shared and analysed, and lessons identified. Innovative theoretical concepts are explored by key academic writers, and the uses of these concepts for policy and practice are explored.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信