Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content

Q3 Engineering
Regina Varnienė-Janssen, Jurate Kupriene
{"title":"Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content","authors":"Regina Varnienė-Janssen, Jurate Kupriene","doi":"10.15388/IM.2018.82.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] \nAuthenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter, it is crucial to define the key conceptual elements that provide the foundation for such a complex framework. The main objective of this paper is to define how authenticity has to be managed in the digital preservation process: to identify the semantic units needed to support core preservation functions in order to ensure the trustworthiness of digital objects and ensure interoperability – i.e., the ability to exchange data between institutions. This paper presents results from the first stage of the research: the scope of authenticity and provenance content needed to support core preservation functions and ensure interoperability – the ability to exchange data between institutions and assess the added value of the Europeana and VEPIS regarding authenticity and provenance based on the adequacy of analyzed international models for authenticity and provenance.Methodology: by applying the EU 2–3–6 concept of added value for electronic publishing and qualitative content analysis of research literature, we conceptualized the Content Creation Process, which refers to the structure and meaning of authenticity and provenance. This approach enabled us to identify the scope of the content of authenticity and provenance.","PeriodicalId":37230,"journal":{"name":"Informacijos Mokslai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacijos Mokslai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/IM.2018.82.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] Authenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter, it is crucial to define the key conceptual elements that provide the foundation for such a complex framework. The main objective of this paper is to define how authenticity has to be managed in the digital preservation process: to identify the semantic units needed to support core preservation functions in order to ensure the trustworthiness of digital objects and ensure interoperability – i.e., the ability to exchange data between institutions. This paper presents results from the first stage of the research: the scope of authenticity and provenance content needed to support core preservation functions and ensure interoperability – the ability to exchange data between institutions and assess the added value of the Europeana and VEPIS regarding authenticity and provenance based on the adequacy of analyzed international models for authenticity and provenance.Methodology: by applying the EU 2–3–6 concept of added value for electronic publishing and qualitative content analysis of research literature, we conceptualized the Content Creation Process, which refers to the structure and meaning of authenticity and provenance. This approach enabled us to identify the scope of the content of authenticity and provenance.
数字长期保存中的真实性和来源:内容范围分析
[全文,英文摘要;立陶宛文摘要]真实性是数字物体长期保存的一个根本问题;然而,真实性的验证是一项复杂的任务&它需要将出处的表示作为信任的先决条件。就这一点而言,至关重要的是要确定为这样一个复杂的框架奠定基础的关键概念要素。本文的主要目的是定义在数字保存过程中如何管理真实性:确定支持核心保存功能所需的语义单元,以确保数字对象的可信度和互操作性,即机构之间交换数据的能力。本文介绍了第一阶段研究的结果:支持核心保存功能和确保互操作性所需的真实性和出处内容的范围——在分析的国际模型的充分性的基础上,在机构之间交换数据并评估欧洲和VEPIS关于真实性和来源的附加值的能力真实性和出处。方法论:通过应用欧盟2–3–6的电子出版附加值概念和研究文献的定性内容分析,我们对内容创造过程进行了概念化,即真实性和出处的结构和意义。这种方法使我们能够确定内容的真实性和出处的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informacijos Mokslai
Informacijos Mokslai Engineering-Media Technology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信