Old Wine in a New Bottle? Green Industrial Policy and the Use of Safeguards in the Solar Sector

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Mandy Meng Fang
{"title":"Old Wine in a New Bottle? Green Industrial Policy and the Use of Safeguards in the Solar Sector","authors":"Mandy Meng Fang","doi":"10.54648/trad2021024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enhancing manufacturing competitiveness in the solar photovoltaics (PV) sector has been a political priority for numerous countries, with green industrial policies often used to effectuate such priorities. In 2018, safeguards were utilized by the United States as a new form of green industrial policies in the solar PV sector, which was quickly followed by India. Safeguards are distinctly different from other widely employed green industrial policies, and their use threatens the multilateral trading system and impedes much-needed efforts to mitigate climate change. This article seeks to advance the literature on the interaction between green industrial policies and the World Trade Organization (WTO) by exploring the legal considerations and policy implications of employing safeguards in the PV Sector. This article discusses why the WTO would likely find that both the US and Indian measures violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Safeguards (AS), but perhaps more importantly reveals several deficiencies associated with the WTO rules and institutional difficulties which may curtail the reduction of trade barriers. This article suggests the negotiation of a plurilateral agreement to eliminate the use of safeguards in the solar PV sector and foster a positive synergy between the trade and climate regimes.\nWTO, Safeguards, Green Industrial Policy, Solar PV, Trade Protectionism, Climate Change","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing manufacturing competitiveness in the solar photovoltaics (PV) sector has been a political priority for numerous countries, with green industrial policies often used to effectuate such priorities. In 2018, safeguards were utilized by the United States as a new form of green industrial policies in the solar PV sector, which was quickly followed by India. Safeguards are distinctly different from other widely employed green industrial policies, and their use threatens the multilateral trading system and impedes much-needed efforts to mitigate climate change. This article seeks to advance the literature on the interaction between green industrial policies and the World Trade Organization (WTO) by exploring the legal considerations and policy implications of employing safeguards in the PV Sector. This article discusses why the WTO would likely find that both the US and Indian measures violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Safeguards (AS), but perhaps more importantly reveals several deficiencies associated with the WTO rules and institutional difficulties which may curtail the reduction of trade barriers. This article suggests the negotiation of a plurilateral agreement to eliminate the use of safeguards in the solar PV sector and foster a positive synergy between the trade and climate regimes. WTO, Safeguards, Green Industrial Policy, Solar PV, Trade Protectionism, Climate Change
新瓶装旧酒?绿色产业政策与太阳能行业保障措施的使用
提高太阳能光伏行业的制造业竞争力一直是许多国家的政治优先事项,绿色产业政策经常被用来实现这些优先事项。2018年,美国将保障措施作为太阳能光伏行业的一种新形式的绿色产业政策,印度也迅速效仿。保障措施与其他广泛采用的绿色产业政策截然不同,它们的使用威胁到多边贸易体系,阻碍了缓解气候变化的急需努力。本文试图通过探讨在光伏行业采用保障措施的法律考虑和政策影响,推进绿色产业政策与世界贸易组织(WTO)之间互动的文献。这篇文章讨论了为什么世贸组织可能会发现美国和印度的措施都违反了《关税及贸易总协定》和《保障协定》,但也许更重要的是,揭示了与世贸组织规则有关的一些缺陷和可能阻碍贸易壁垒减少的体制困难。这篇文章建议谈判一项多边协议,以消除在太阳能光伏部门使用保障措施,并促进贸易和气候制度之间的积极协同作用。WTO、保障措施、绿色产业政策、太阳能光伏、贸易保护主义、气候变化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信