Women’s Attitudes toward Sexual Objectification in Brands: A Political Ideology Perspective

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
C. Torelli, Yafei Guo, Hyewon Cho
{"title":"Women’s Attitudes toward Sexual Objectification in Brands: A Political Ideology Perspective","authors":"C. Torelli, Yafei Guo, Hyewon Cho","doi":"10.1086/719585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the issue of gender inequality dominates the public discourse, the country is sharply divided along party lines about its importance and the way to deal with it. In this polarized context, marketers struggle to devise brand communication strategies that will successfully connect with equality-conscious female consumers. By integrating research in political ideology, sexism, and brand communications, this research uncovers the types of sexual appeals that are more likely to resonate with female consumers who endorse a liberal (vs. conservative) ideology. Results of three lab experiments and a secondary data set demonstrate that liberal (vs. conservative) women are more likely to reject brands that are associated with a sexually objectified image of women. Furthermore, this effect is driven by liberal women’s rejection of benevolent sexism. These results are discussed in terms of the contributions to political ideology and brand communications research, as well as the implications for marketers’ communication strategies.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although the issue of gender inequality dominates the public discourse, the country is sharply divided along party lines about its importance and the way to deal with it. In this polarized context, marketers struggle to devise brand communication strategies that will successfully connect with equality-conscious female consumers. By integrating research in political ideology, sexism, and brand communications, this research uncovers the types of sexual appeals that are more likely to resonate with female consumers who endorse a liberal (vs. conservative) ideology. Results of three lab experiments and a secondary data set demonstrate that liberal (vs. conservative) women are more likely to reject brands that are associated with a sexually objectified image of women. Furthermore, this effect is driven by liberal women’s rejection of benevolent sexism. These results are discussed in terms of the contributions to political ideology and brand communications research, as well as the implications for marketers’ communication strategies.
女性对品牌中性物化的态度:一个政治意识形态的视角
尽管性别不平等问题在公共话语中占据主导地位,但该国在其重要性和应对方式上存在严重的党派分歧。在这种两极分化的背景下,营销人员很难制定出能够成功与有平等意识的女性消费者建立联系的品牌传播策略。通过整合政治意识形态、性别歧视和品牌传播方面的研究,这项研究揭示了更容易引起支持自由主义(与保守主义)意识形态的女性消费者共鸣的性诉求类型。三项实验室实验和二次数据集的结果表明,自由派(相对于保守派)女性更有可能拒绝与女性性客体化形象相关的品牌。此外,这种影响是由自由派女性拒绝仁慈的性别歧视所驱动的。讨论了这些结果对政治意识形态和品牌传播研究的贡献,以及对营销人员传播策略的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信