{"title":"L’éloge du fleuve. La Seine et ses bords, par C. Nodier entre album pittoresque et mémoire géographique","authors":"Marta Sukiennicka","doi":"10.14746/strop.2023.50.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the question of the authorship and generic classification of La Seine et ses bords (1836). This work is commonly misattributed to Charles Nodier, but the most likely author is Alexandre Mure de Pélanne, who in 1835 published a similar essay on the Saône River. The comparison of both works shows a clear difference in their perspectives: La Saône et ses bords, with an emphasis on the his- torical context, meets the generic criteria of album pittoresque (picturesque album), whereas a focus on topography and hydrology of La Seine et ses bords brings it closer to the genre of mémoire géographique (geographical memoir). The scientific scope of La Seine et ses bords also distinguishes it from Nodier’s and Taylor’s Voyages pittoresques et romantiques dans l’ancienne France, the most famous cycle of Romantic journeys through France.","PeriodicalId":35131,"journal":{"name":"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Romanica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2023.50.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines the question of the authorship and generic classification of La Seine et ses bords (1836). This work is commonly misattributed to Charles Nodier, but the most likely author is Alexandre Mure de Pélanne, who in 1835 published a similar essay on the Saône River. The comparison of both works shows a clear difference in their perspectives: La Saône et ses bords, with an emphasis on the his- torical context, meets the generic criteria of album pittoresque (picturesque album), whereas a focus on topography and hydrology of La Seine et ses bords brings it closer to the genre of mémoire géographique (geographical memoir). The scientific scope of La Seine et ses bords also distinguishes it from Nodier’s and Taylor’s Voyages pittoresques et romantiques dans l’ancienne France, the most famous cycle of Romantic journeys through France.
本文考察了《塞纳和他的书》(1836)的作者身份和一般分类问题。这项工作通常被误认为是查尔斯·诺迪尔的,但最有可能的作者是亚历山大·穆雷·德·帕姆兰,他在1835年发表了一篇关于Saône河的类似文章。通过对两部作品的比较,可以看出他们的视角有明显的不同:《La Saône et ses bords》强调历史背景,符合《pittoresque》(风景如画的相册)的一般标准,而《La Seine et ses bords》则侧重于地形和水文,使其更接近于《msammoire gsamographique》(地理回忆录)的类型。《塞纳河之旅》的科学范围也将其与诺迪埃和泰勒的《法国古代浪漫之旅》(最著名的法国浪漫之旅)区分开来。