Money Laundering Crime in The Perspective of Islamic Law in The System of Proof

Ariman Sitompul, Arien Kartika, W. Wahyuni
{"title":"Money Laundering Crime in The Perspective of Islamic Law in The System of Proof","authors":"Ariman Sitompul, Arien Kartika, W. Wahyuni","doi":"10.21154/justicia.v19i2.3744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper initiates the study of Islamic law, related to the reverse proof system contained in Articles 77 and 78 contained in law No. 8 of 2010. In Article 77, it is known that in court there is an examination with an interest in proving the absence of criminal acts related to the ownership of assets. In addition, from Article 78, it is known that the submission of sufficient evidence related to the possession of assets is an obligation for the defendant when the examination contained in Article 77 is carried out. Islamic law in the study of the burden of scientific proof needs to get a big position, because it is believed that Islamic law has a part of the scope that covers everything. In this study the authors used qualitative methods to respond to the concept of fiqh life in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is related to the burden of proof reversed using the opinions of Islamic law, usul fiqh and legislation. From the results of the study, the evidence to the contrary does not apply to all criminal cases, but only to special cases such as money laundering. Money laundering in Indonesia can be in the form of enrichment by illegal means. Islamic law in the development of law in Indonesia also minimizes the crime of criminal origin that develops and continues in money crimes from the influence of controlling illicit money that feels like halal money and also includes sanctions against perpetrators of crimes punished by Islam into national law.","PeriodicalId":31294,"journal":{"name":"Justicia Islamica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justicia Islamica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i2.3744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper initiates the study of Islamic law, related to the reverse proof system contained in Articles 77 and 78 contained in law No. 8 of 2010. In Article 77, it is known that in court there is an examination with an interest in proving the absence of criminal acts related to the ownership of assets. In addition, from Article 78, it is known that the submission of sufficient evidence related to the possession of assets is an obligation for the defendant when the examination contained in Article 77 is carried out. Islamic law in the study of the burden of scientific proof needs to get a big position, because it is believed that Islamic law has a part of the scope that covers everything. In this study the authors used qualitative methods to respond to the concept of fiqh life in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is related to the burden of proof reversed using the opinions of Islamic law, usul fiqh and legislation. From the results of the study, the evidence to the contrary does not apply to all criminal cases, but only to special cases such as money laundering. Money laundering in Indonesia can be in the form of enrichment by illegal means. Islamic law in the development of law in Indonesia also minimizes the crime of criminal origin that develops and continues in money crimes from the influence of controlling illicit money that feels like halal money and also includes sanctions against perpetrators of crimes punished by Islam into national law.
伊斯兰法视角下的洗钱罪证据体系
本文启动了对伊斯兰法律的研究,涉及2010年第8号法律第77条和第78条所载的反向证明制度。第77条规定,在法庭上进行审查,目的是证明不存在与资产所有权有关的犯罪行为。此外,根据第七十八条可知,在进行第七十七条所载的审查时,被告有义务提交与资产占有有关的充分证据。伊斯兰法在科学举证责任研究中需要得到很大的地位,因为人们认为伊斯兰法有一部分的适用范围,涵盖了一切。在这项研究中,作者使用了定性的方法来回应印尼的fiqh生命概念。本研究的目的是利用伊斯兰法律、普通法和立法的观点来推翻举证责任。从研究结果来看,相反的证据并不适用于所有刑事案件,而仅适用于洗钱等特殊案件。印度尼西亚的洗钱可以是通过非法手段进行的致富。在印度尼西亚法律发展过程中,伊斯兰法还最大限度地减少了因控制感觉像清真货币的非法货币而在金钱犯罪中发展和持续的犯罪,并将对伊斯兰惩罚的犯罪者的制裁纳入国家法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信