Tecnología ósea en la Depresión del Río Salado (provincia de Buenos Aires)

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
P. Escosteguy, M. Salemme, M. González
{"title":"Tecnología ósea en la Depresión del Río Salado (provincia de Buenos Aires)","authors":"P. Escosteguy, M. Salemme, M. González","doi":"10.34096/ARQUEOLOGIA.T23.N3.4008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hunter-gatherer-fishers inhabited the wetlands of the Rio Salado Depression (Argentine Pampas) during the Late Holocene ( ca . 2400 to 400 years BP); they manufactured pottery and developed different strategies of acquisition and manufacture of bones and teeth for use as tools. The economy of these societies was based mainly on exploiting small-sized species, such as coypu (a rodent), fishes, as well as continental and aquatic birds. Two species of deer were complementary resources. Twenty-five bones from the sites LG1 (n= 4) and LG5 (n= 21) that show indications of human manipulation  were subjected to a techno-morphological analysis. The following parameters were considered: material, type of fracture, dimensions and presence/absence of marks; the effects of taphonomic agents and processes on bone surfaces are evaluated as well. Human modification on the bones of several taxa were identified: Aves (n= 4), Rallidae (n= 1), Mammalia (n= 2), Cervidae (n=4), Ozotoceros bezoarticus (n=8), Blastoceros dichotomus (n= 1), Rodentia (n= 1), Rodentia cf. Caviinae (n= 3) and Myocastor coypus (n= 1). On this basis, we characterized the Morphological Groups as, tubes, bevelled tools, points (channelled, semi-channeled, blunt-ended), and those tools not allocated to these groups, were designated as Undetermined. The potential function of these tools is discussed, we propose that bone technology was part of the integral use of faunal resources in the area.","PeriodicalId":51926,"journal":{"name":"Arqueologia","volume":"23 1","pages":"65-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arqueologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/ARQUEOLOGIA.T23.N3.4008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Hunter-gatherer-fishers inhabited the wetlands of the Rio Salado Depression (Argentine Pampas) during the Late Holocene ( ca . 2400 to 400 years BP); they manufactured pottery and developed different strategies of acquisition and manufacture of bones and teeth for use as tools. The economy of these societies was based mainly on exploiting small-sized species, such as coypu (a rodent), fishes, as well as continental and aquatic birds. Two species of deer were complementary resources. Twenty-five bones from the sites LG1 (n= 4) and LG5 (n= 21) that show indications of human manipulation  were subjected to a techno-morphological analysis. The following parameters were considered: material, type of fracture, dimensions and presence/absence of marks; the effects of taphonomic agents and processes on bone surfaces are evaluated as well. Human modification on the bones of several taxa were identified: Aves (n= 4), Rallidae (n= 1), Mammalia (n= 2), Cervidae (n=4), Ozotoceros bezoarticus (n=8), Blastoceros dichotomus (n= 1), Rodentia (n= 1), Rodentia cf. Caviinae (n= 3) and Myocastor coypus (n= 1). On this basis, we characterized the Morphological Groups as, tubes, bevelled tools, points (channelled, semi-channeled, blunt-ended), and those tools not allocated to these groups, were designated as Undetermined. The potential function of these tools is discussed, we propose that bone technology was part of the integral use of faunal resources in the area.
萨拉多河洼地(布宜诺斯艾利斯省)的骨技术
在全新世晚期,狩猎-采集-捕鱼者居住在里约热内卢萨拉多洼地(阿根廷潘帕斯草原)的湿地上。距今2400 ~ 400年);他们制造陶器,并发展了不同的策略来获取和制造用作工具的骨头和牙齿。这些社会的经济主要以开发小型物种为基础,如河狸(一种啮齿动物)、鱼类以及陆鸟和水鸟。两种鹿是互补资源。来自LG1 (n= 4)和LG5 (n= 21)的25块显示人类操作迹象的骨头进行了技术形态学分析。考虑了以下参数:材料、断裂类型、尺寸和是否存在标记;埋植剂和过程对骨表面的影响也进行了评估。鉴定出鸟类(n=4)、蝙蝠科(n= 1)、哺乳类(n= 2)、鹿科(n=4)、牛齿目(n=8)、双角目(n= 1)、啮齿目(n= 1)、啮齿目cf. Caviinae (n= 3)、鼠形目(n= 1)等动物类群对人类骨骼的修饰。在此基础上,我们将这些类群划分为管状、斜状工具、尖状工具(槽状、半槽状、钝端),未归属于这些类群的工具称为未确定类群。讨论了这些工具的潜在功能,我们认为骨技术是该地区动物资源综合利用的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arqueologia
Arqueologia ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信