Investigation of Flexion-Relaxation Ratio Symmetry in Subjects With and Without Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

Q4 Medicine
Hasan Shamsi, K. Khademi, F. Okhovatian
{"title":"Investigation of Flexion-Relaxation Ratio Symmetry in Subjects With and Without Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain","authors":"Hasan Shamsi, K. Khademi, F. Okhovatian","doi":"10.18502/jmr.v16i2.9305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neuromuscular imbalance between right and left sides of Cervical Erector Spinae (CES) muscles can induce pain by applying the asymmetric loads on the spine incorrectly. This study evaluated the symmetry of the right and left cervical flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) in patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain (NSCNP) and healthy subjects. We aimed to investigate the symmetry of FRR on the right and left sides of the CES muscles in individuals with and without NSCNP. \nMaterials and Methods: A total of 25 patients with NSCNP and 25 healthy subjects participated in this study. The surface electromyography activity of CES muscles during four phases of flexion and extension tasks were measured and recorded. Unilateral FRR in the right and left sides of CES muscles was calculated and compared in each group. \nResults: Only in NSCNP patients, FRR in the right CES muscle was significantly higher than that in the left one (P<0.05). Also, FRR for bilateral CES muscles was significantly higher in healthy subjects than in NSCNP patients (P<0.001). \nConclusion: The study results indicated a greater FRR asymmetry in CES muscles in NSCNP patients than in healthy subjects. This asymmetry is probably due to the dominance of the limb. Moreover, asymmetric FRR as a kind of neuromuscular imbalance may cause pain due to imposing asymmetric loads on spine structures.","PeriodicalId":34281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v16i2.9305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromuscular imbalance between right and left sides of Cervical Erector Spinae (CES) muscles can induce pain by applying the asymmetric loads on the spine incorrectly. This study evaluated the symmetry of the right and left cervical flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) in patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain (NSCNP) and healthy subjects. We aimed to investigate the symmetry of FRR on the right and left sides of the CES muscles in individuals with and without NSCNP. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 patients with NSCNP and 25 healthy subjects participated in this study. The surface electromyography activity of CES muscles during four phases of flexion and extension tasks were measured and recorded. Unilateral FRR in the right and left sides of CES muscles was calculated and compared in each group. Results: Only in NSCNP patients, FRR in the right CES muscle was significantly higher than that in the left one (P<0.05). Also, FRR for bilateral CES muscles was significantly higher in healthy subjects than in NSCNP patients (P<0.001). Conclusion: The study results indicated a greater FRR asymmetry in CES muscles in NSCNP patients than in healthy subjects. This asymmetry is probably due to the dominance of the limb. Moreover, asymmetric FRR as a kind of neuromuscular imbalance may cause pain due to imposing asymmetric loads on spine structures.
有无非特异性慢性颈部疼痛受试者屈曲-松弛比对称性的研究
引言:颈椎竖脊肌(CES)左右两侧的神经肌肉失衡会通过错误地在脊椎上施加不对称负荷而引起疼痛。本研究评估了非特异性慢性颈部疼痛(NSCNP)患者和健康受试者的左右颈椎屈曲松弛比(FRR)的对称性。我们旨在研究患有和不患有NSCNP的个体的CES肌肉左右侧FRR的对称性。材料和方法:共有25名NSCNP患者和25名健康受试者参与了本研究。测量并记录了屈伸任务四个阶段CES肌肉的表面肌电活动。计算各组CES肌肉左右侧的单侧FRR并进行比较。结果:仅在NSCNP患者中,右侧CES肌的FRR显著高于左侧(P<0.05)。此外,健康受试者双侧CES肌肉的FRR明显高于NSCNP患者(P<0.001)。这种不对称可能是由于肢体的优势。此外,不对称FRR作为一种神经肌肉失衡,可能会因对脊柱结构施加不对称负荷而引起疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信