THE PRINCIPLE OF THE BEST INTERESTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHILD IN A DECISION TO CANCEL A CHILD'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

R. Mustika, I. M. P. Dharsana
{"title":"THE PRINCIPLE OF THE BEST INTERESTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHILD IN A DECISION TO CANCEL A CHILD'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE","authors":"R. Mustika, I. M. P. Dharsana","doi":"10.26532/jph.v10i1.30432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to provide an understanding of the determination to cancel a child's birth certificate that can potentially violate children's human rights. So that the role of judges as a judicial institution is needed to protect children's rights as it should. Marriage registration is merely an administrative action and does not affect the validity of the marriage. Errors in marriage registration should not necessarily affect the status of the child's position. Because after all, birth certificates are issued by the state to protect and provide legal certainty over the child's status. This research used a typology of research with a prescriptive form and then normative juridical research methods with secondary data derived from laws and regulations relating to child protection. In conclusion, legal action to cancel a child's birth certificate due to legal defects in a marriage can be said to be an action that is contrary to the principle of the best interests of the child, therefore it is fitting that the application for annulment of a child's birth certificate be properly considered by the panel of judges who act as an extension of the state in the judicial field.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i1.30432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to provide an understanding of the determination to cancel a child's birth certificate that can potentially violate children's human rights. So that the role of judges as a judicial institution is needed to protect children's rights as it should. Marriage registration is merely an administrative action and does not affect the validity of the marriage. Errors in marriage registration should not necessarily affect the status of the child's position. Because after all, birth certificates are issued by the state to protect and provide legal certainty over the child's status. This research used a typology of research with a prescriptive form and then normative juridical research methods with secondary data derived from laws and regulations relating to child protection. In conclusion, legal action to cancel a child's birth certificate due to legal defects in a marriage can be said to be an action that is contrary to the principle of the best interests of the child, therefore it is fitting that the application for annulment of a child's birth certificate be properly considered by the panel of judges who act as an extension of the state in the judicial field.
取消儿童出生证明的决定中儿童的最大利益原则
本研究的目的是提供对可能侵犯儿童人权的取消儿童出生证明的决定的理解。因此,需要法官作为一个司法机构发挥应有的作用来保护儿童的权利。婚姻登记是一种行政行为,不影响婚姻的效力。婚姻登记错误不一定会影响孩子的地位地位。因为毕竟,出生证明是由国家颁发的,以保护和提供孩子身份的法律确定性。本研究采用了一种具有规定性形式的研究类型学,然后是规范性的司法研究方法,其二手数据来自与儿童保护有关的法律法规。综上所述,因婚姻存在法律缺陷而对子女提出的撤销出生证明的法律诉讼可以说是一种违背子女最大利益原则的行为,因此,作为国家在司法领域延伸的法官小组应当适当地考虑对子女出生证明的撤销申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书