{"title":"Maritime heritage in crisis: indigenous landscapes and global ecological breakdown","authors":"Madeline Fowler","doi":"10.1080/2159032X.2017.1404231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Extract] Reading the preface of Richard M. Hutching's provocative Maritime Heritage in Crisis, I found myself agreeing with the prominent archaeology professor who argued that archaeologies' colonialist agenda, driven by capitalism and producing elitist, racist and pro-development narratives, is \"old news\" (xii–xiii). However, by the conclusion of the book, Hutchings had convinced me that this \"head in the sand\" attitude is no longer sustainable. Archaeologists and resource managers model themselves as experts\", \"saviors\" and \"specialists\", yet hide behind these roles like the pianists on RMS Titanic – part of the problem yet blind to the fact. For decades, archaeology and cultural resource management (CRM) have been complicit in the destruction of Indigenous heritage in colonial states like Canada and America – the settings for this volume. Yet, as argued by Hutchings in his frank, first person voice, this destruction is as inherent today, to the point that he describes it as a type of \"violence\" (96). Through controlling heritage, archaeology and CRM dominate the production of knowledge about Indigenous pasts, and so control these people (101).","PeriodicalId":44088,"journal":{"name":"Heritage and Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"96 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1404231","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2017.1404231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
[Extract] Reading the preface of Richard M. Hutching's provocative Maritime Heritage in Crisis, I found myself agreeing with the prominent archaeology professor who argued that archaeologies' colonialist agenda, driven by capitalism and producing elitist, racist and pro-development narratives, is "old news" (xii–xiii). However, by the conclusion of the book, Hutchings had convinced me that this "head in the sand" attitude is no longer sustainable. Archaeologists and resource managers model themselves as experts", "saviors" and "specialists", yet hide behind these roles like the pianists on RMS Titanic – part of the problem yet blind to the fact. For decades, archaeology and cultural resource management (CRM) have been complicit in the destruction of Indigenous heritage in colonial states like Canada and America – the settings for this volume. Yet, as argued by Hutchings in his frank, first person voice, this destruction is as inherent today, to the point that he describes it as a type of "violence" (96). Through controlling heritage, archaeology and CRM dominate the production of knowledge about Indigenous pasts, and so control these people (101).
阅读理查德·m·哈钦(Richard M. Hutching)的《危机中的海洋遗产》(Maritime Heritage in Crisis)的序言,我发现自己同意这位著名考古学教授的观点,他认为,由资本主义驱动的考古学的殖民主义议程,产生了精英主义、种族主义和亲发展的叙事,是“旧新闻”(xii-xiii)。然而,在书的结尾,哈钦斯说服了我,这种“把头藏在沙子里”的态度不再是可持续的。考古学家和资源管理者把自己塑造成“专家”、“救星”和“专家”,但却像泰坦尼克号上的钢琴家一样隐藏在这些角色背后——部分问题存在,但对事实视而不见。几十年来,考古学和文化资源管理(CRM)一直是破坏加拿大和美国等殖民国家土著遗产的同谋——本书的背景。然而,正如哈钦斯以坦率的第一人称所说的那样,这种破坏在今天仍然是固有的,以至于他将其描述为一种“暴力”(96)。通过控制遗产,考古学和CRM控制了关于土著过去的知识的生产,从而控制了这些人(101)。
期刊介绍:
Heritage & Society is a global, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scholarly, professional, and community reflection on the cultural, political, and economic impacts of heritage on contemporary society. We seek to examine the current social roles of collective memory, historic preservation, cultural resource management, public interpretation, cultural preservation and revitalization, sites of conscience, diasporic heritage, education, legal/legislative developments, cultural heritage ethics, and central heritage concepts such as authenticity, significance, and value. The journal provides an engaging forum about tangible and intangible heritage for those who work with international and governmental organizations, academic institutions, private heritage consulting and CRM firms, and local, associated, and indigenous communities. With a special emphasis on social science approaches and an international perspective, the journal will facilitate lively, critical discussion and dissemination of practical data among heritage professionals, planners, policymakers, and community leaders.