Postnatal depression – the role of attachment and mentalization

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
J. Świtalska
{"title":"Postnatal depression – the role of attachment and mentalization","authors":"J. Świtalska","doi":"10.12740/app/139246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study: The aim of this paper was to find differences in the quality of relationships with a partner, mother’s attachment to the child, mentalization capacity and the style of the mother’s attachment between groups of women with and without postnatal depression (also referred to as postpartum depression) as measured by the EPDS questionnaire. Materials and methods: The research group comprised 68 women in total. They were divided into two groups. Thirty-three women who scored more than or equal to 12 points in the EPDS questionnaire were included in the group with postnatal depression. The control group consisted of 35 women who scored below 12 points on the same scale. Results: The following tools were used in the study: Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR), Mental Scale Task (MST), Quality of Relationships Inventory (QRI), and Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ). Conclusions: The results obtained point out to specific differences between the two groups. The women whose EPDS score indicates postnatal depression are characterized by a weaker bond with their child, weakened mentalization capacity, their attachment patterns are more often insecure and relationship-related problems tend to occur. postnatal depression; attachment; relationship; mentalization","PeriodicalId":44856,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12740/app/139246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study: The aim of this paper was to find differences in the quality of relationships with a partner, mother’s attachment to the child, mentalization capacity and the style of the mother’s attachment between groups of women with and without postnatal depression (also referred to as postpartum depression) as measured by the EPDS questionnaire. Materials and methods: The research group comprised 68 women in total. They were divided into two groups. Thirty-three women who scored more than or equal to 12 points in the EPDS questionnaire were included in the group with postnatal depression. The control group consisted of 35 women who scored below 12 points on the same scale. Results: The following tools were used in the study: Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR), Mental Scale Task (MST), Quality of Relationships Inventory (QRI), and Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ). Conclusions: The results obtained point out to specific differences between the two groups. The women whose EPDS score indicates postnatal depression are characterized by a weaker bond with their child, weakened mentalization capacity, their attachment patterns are more often insecure and relationship-related problems tend to occur. postnatal depression; attachment; relationship; mentalization
产后抑郁——依恋和心理化的作用
研究目的:本文旨在通过EPDS问卷调查,发现患有产后抑郁症(也称为产后抑郁症)和未患有产后抑郁症的女性群体在与伴侣的关系质量、母亲对孩子的依恋、心理化能力和母亲依恋风格方面的差异。材料和方法:研究组共有68名女性。他们被分成两组。33名EPDS问卷得分大于或等于12分的女性被纳入产后抑郁症组。对照组由35名得分低于12分的女性组成。结果:研究中使用了以下工具:亲密关系体验(ECR)、心理量表任务(MST)、关系质量量表(QRI)和产后联系问卷(PBQ)。结论:所获得的结果指出了两组之间的具体差异。EPDS评分显示产后抑郁症的女性的特点是与孩子的联系较弱,心理化能力较弱,她们的依恋模式更经常不安全,而且往往会出现与关系相关的问题。产后抑郁症;附件关系心理化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信