Evaluation of Monteggia Fracture Outcomes: Acute to Chronic.

The Hand Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1177/15589447231155582
Samuel F Antoon, Stephanie A Russo, Scott H Kozin, Dan A Zlotolow
{"title":"Evaluation of Monteggia Fracture Outcomes: Acute to Chronic.","authors":"Samuel F Antoon, Stephanie A Russo, Scott H Kozin, Dan A Zlotolow","doi":"10.1177/15589447231155582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our study aims to characterize the results of Monteggia fractures treated in our practice and to determine factors associated with good or poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of children aged 17 and under with acute, subacute, or chronic Monteggia fractures who were treated at our institution was performed. The primary outcomes were initial reduction and maintenance of joint reduction, while the secondary outcomes were elbow flexion/extension and forearm supination/pronation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients with Monteggia fractures were identified. Two patients were excluded: 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 had congenital absence of the elbow flexors. Thus, our final cohort was 15 patients (acute n = 3, subacute n = 4, chronic group n = 8). Median final follow-up was 1.9 years (range = 34 days-8 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative range of motion (ROM) was the most important factor in determining postoperative ROM in this cohort of patients with chronic Monteggia fractures. All patients who presented with excellent preoperative ROM, regardless of their timing category, had an excellent ROM outcome. Time from initial injury also played an important role. All patients in the acute and subacute categories had good or excellent postoperative ROM. Patients who were further from the initial injury were more likely to present with worse preoperative ROM and, in turn, had worse outcomes with postoperative ROM.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"961-966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231155582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our study aims to characterize the results of Monteggia fractures treated in our practice and to determine factors associated with good or poor outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of children aged 17 and under with acute, subacute, or chronic Monteggia fractures who were treated at our institution was performed. The primary outcomes were initial reduction and maintenance of joint reduction, while the secondary outcomes were elbow flexion/extension and forearm supination/pronation.

Results: Seventeen patients with Monteggia fractures were identified. Two patients were excluded: 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 had congenital absence of the elbow flexors. Thus, our final cohort was 15 patients (acute n = 3, subacute n = 4, chronic group n = 8). Median final follow-up was 1.9 years (range = 34 days-8 years).

Conclusion: Preoperative range of motion (ROM) was the most important factor in determining postoperative ROM in this cohort of patients with chronic Monteggia fractures. All patients who presented with excellent preoperative ROM, regardless of their timing category, had an excellent ROM outcome. Time from initial injury also played an important role. All patients in the acute and subacute categories had good or excellent postoperative ROM. Patients who were further from the initial injury were more likely to present with worse preoperative ROM and, in turn, had worse outcomes with postoperative ROM.

评估蒙特吉亚骨折的结果:急性到慢性
我们的研究旨在描述在我们的实践中治疗的Monteggia骨折的结果,并确定与良好或不良结果相关的因素。对在我们机构接受治疗的17岁及以下患有急性、亚急性或慢性孟氏骨折的儿童进行了回顾性审查。主要结果是关节复位的初始复位和维持,而次要结果是肘部屈曲/伸展和前臂旋后/内旋。确认了17名蒙特吉骨折患者。两名患者被排除在外:1名失访,1名先天性肘屈肌缺失。因此,我们的最终队列是15名患者(急性组n=3,亚急性组n=4,慢性组n=8)。中位最终随访时间为1.9年(范围=34天-8年)。术前活动范围(ROM)是决定这组慢性孟氏骨折患者术后活动范围的最重要因素。所有术前ROM表现良好的患者,无论其时间类别如何,均具有良好的ROM结果。初次受伤后的时间也起到了重要作用。所有急性和亚急性类别的患者术后ROM均良好或良好。距离最初损伤更远的患者术前ROM更差,反过来,术后ROM的结果也更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信