Epidermal Growth Factor Application versus Observation on Healing of Acute Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial

Arlex Michael Atanacio, Emily Grace Teodoro-Estaris
{"title":"Epidermal Growth Factor Application versus Observation on Healing of Acute Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial","authors":"Arlex Michael Atanacio, Emily Grace Teodoro-Estaris","doi":"10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nObjective: To compare the effect of topical epidermal growth factor (EGF) instillation versus observation alone on healing of acute tympanic membrane perforations in terms of closure and hearing test results.\nMethods: \n\n\n\n\nDesign: Randomized, Open label, Clinical Trial\nSetting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital\nParticipants: Seventeen (17) ENT-HNS OPD patients aged between 18 to 65 years old diagnosed with acute tympanic membrane perforation were included in the study. Group A underwent observation while group B was treated with recombinant human EGF solution. Follow- up was on a weekly basis (7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days) where video otoscopy for documentation and measurement of perforation using ImageJTM software was done. Pure tone audiometry was used to compare hearing improvement pre and post study in both observation and treatment groups.\n\n\n\n\nResults: At baseline, there was no significant difference in the sizes of perforations: 24.20 ± 9.95 (treatment) vs. 32.64 ± 11.62 (observation) with a p-value of .131. Following treatment, mean changes in perforation size were significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the observation group from baseline to day 7 (M = -9.08, n = 15.11 vs. M = -1.06, n = 31.58); p = .009; day 7 to 14 (M = -6.37, n = 13.78 vs. M = -0.79, n = 30.79); p = .003; and from day 14 to 21 (M = -5.65, n = 10.89 vs. M = -0.72, n = 30.07); p = .004 but not from day 21 to 28 (M = -4.16, n = 13.99 vs. M = -0.36, n = 29.71; p = .021. From baseline pure tone averages, four participants with mild hearing loss and two with moderate hearing loss achieved normal hearing in the treatment group (while one each with moderate and severe hearing loss did not improve). None of the observation group participants had improved hearing.\nConclusion: Based on our limited experience, topical EGF can be used for traumatic tympanic membrane perforation and otitis media with dry ear perforation during the acute phase or within 3 months of perforation.","PeriodicalId":33358,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32412/pjohns.v37i1.1369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effect of topical epidermal growth factor (EGF) instillation versus observation alone on healing of acute tympanic membrane perforations in terms of closure and hearing test results. Methods:  Design: Randomized, Open label, Clinical Trial Setting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital Participants: Seventeen (17) ENT-HNS OPD patients aged between 18 to 65 years old diagnosed with acute tympanic membrane perforation were included in the study. Group A underwent observation while group B was treated with recombinant human EGF solution. Follow- up was on a weekly basis (7th, 14th, 21st and 28th days) where video otoscopy for documentation and measurement of perforation using ImageJTM software was done. Pure tone audiometry was used to compare hearing improvement pre and post study in both observation and treatment groups. Results: At baseline, there was no significant difference in the sizes of perforations: 24.20 ± 9.95 (treatment) vs. 32.64 ± 11.62 (observation) with a p-value of .131. Following treatment, mean changes in perforation size were significantly greater in the treatment group compared to the observation group from baseline to day 7 (M = -9.08, n = 15.11 vs. M = -1.06, n = 31.58); p = .009; day 7 to 14 (M = -6.37, n = 13.78 vs. M = -0.79, n = 30.79); p = .003; and from day 14 to 21 (M = -5.65, n = 10.89 vs. M = -0.72, n = 30.07); p = .004 but not from day 21 to 28 (M = -4.16, n = 13.99 vs. M = -0.36, n = 29.71; p = .021. From baseline pure tone averages, four participants with mild hearing loss and two with moderate hearing loss achieved normal hearing in the treatment group (while one each with moderate and severe hearing loss did not improve). None of the observation group participants had improved hearing. Conclusion: Based on our limited experience, topical EGF can be used for traumatic tympanic membrane perforation and otitis media with dry ear perforation during the acute phase or within 3 months of perforation.
表皮生长因子在急性鼓膜穿孔中的应用与疗效观察:一项随机开放标签临床试验
【摘要】目的:比较外用表皮生长因子(EGF)与单纯观察对急性鼓膜穿孔愈合的疗效及听力测试结果。设计:随机、开放标签、临床试验设置:三级政府培训医院参与者:17(17)名年龄在18至65岁之间诊断为急性鼓膜穿孔的ENT-HNS OPD患者纳入研究。A组观察,B组用重组人EGF溶液处理。每周随访一次(第7,14,21和28天),使用ImageJTM软件进行视频耳镜记录和测量穿孔。采用纯音测听法比较观察组和治疗组研究前后的听力改善情况。结果:在基线时,两组患者的穿孔大小差异无统计学意义:治疗组(24.20±9.95)比观察组(32.64±11.62),p值为0.131。治疗后,治疗组从基线至第7天穿孔大小的平均变化显著大于观察组(M = -9.08, n = 15.11 vs. M = -1.06, n = 31.58);P = 0.009;第7 ~ 14天(M = -6.37, n = 13.78 vs. M = -0.79, n = 30.79);P = .003;第14 ~ 21天(M = -5.65, n = 10.89 vs. M = -0.72, n = 30.07);p = 0.004,但从第21天到第28天p = 0.004 (M = -4.16, n = 13.99 vs. M = -0.36, n = 29.71;P = 0.021。从基线纯音平均值来看,四名轻度听力损失和两名中度听力损失的参与者在治疗组中达到了正常听力(而中度和重度听力损失各有一人没有改善)。观察组参与者的听力都没有改善。结论:根据我们有限的经验,外用EGF可用于外伤性鼓膜穿孔和中耳炎伴干耳穿孔的急性期或穿孔后3个月内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信