Cost structures, innovation and welfare in monopoly

Q2 Social Sciences
Suryaprakash Mishra
{"title":"Cost structures, innovation and welfare in monopoly","authors":"Suryaprakash Mishra","doi":"10.1080/17441056.2022.2034330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper, concerning cost structures and innovation in monopoly and the resulting welfare, has counter-intuitive results. We consider linear demand and two cases of cost structures namely constant marginal cost (henceforth CMC) and increasing marginal cost (henceforth IMC) in monopoly, and show that innovation is rewarding in both situations. From the regulator’s perspective, in absence of any innovation or in case of equal innovation in both cases, a monopolist with an IMC may be preferred as against the one with a CMC.","PeriodicalId":52118,"journal":{"name":"European Competition Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"558 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Competition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2022.2034330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper, concerning cost structures and innovation in monopoly and the resulting welfare, has counter-intuitive results. We consider linear demand and two cases of cost structures namely constant marginal cost (henceforth CMC) and increasing marginal cost (henceforth IMC) in monopoly, and show that innovation is rewarding in both situations. From the regulator’s perspective, in absence of any innovation or in case of equal innovation in both cases, a monopolist with an IMC may be preferred as against the one with a CMC.
垄断中的成本结构、创新与福利
这篇关于成本结构和垄断创新以及由此产生的福利的论文得出了反直觉的结果。我们考虑了线性需求和两种成本结构的情况,即垄断下的边际成本不变(CMC)和边际成本增加(IMC),并表明在这两种情况下创新都是有益的。从监管机构的角度来看,在没有任何创新的情况下,或者在两种情况下都有相同的创新的情况下,拥有IMC的垄断者可能比拥有CMC的垄断者更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Competition Journal
European Competition Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The European Competition Journal publishes outstanding scholarly articles relating to European competition law and economics. Its mission is to help foster learning and debate about how European competition law and policy can continue to develop in an economically rational way. Articles published in the Journal are subject to rigorous peer review by leading experts from around Europe. Topics include: -Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers -Enlargement of the Union - the ramifications for Competition Policy -Unilateral and Coordinated Effects in Merger Control -Modernisation of European Competition law -Cartels and Leniency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信