Which Strategies Improve Physicians' Experience with Health Information Technology?

ACI open Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1731338
Jacqueline Haskell, Brittany Mandeville, Emily Cooper, Rebekah L. Gardner
{"title":"Which Strategies Improve Physicians' Experience with Health Information Technology?","authors":"Jacqueline Haskell, Brittany Mandeville, Emily Cooper, Rebekah L. Gardner","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives While electronic health records (EHRs) have improved billing efficiency and note legibility, they may also disrupt clinical workflows, affect patient interactions, and contribute to physician burnout. This study aimed to identify effective strategies, as reported by physicians, to mitigate these EHR shortcomings. Methods The Rhode Island Department of Health administers a health information technology (HIT) survey biennially to all physicians in active practice statewide. The 2019 survey asked physicians about strategies implemented personally or by their practice to improve their experience working with HIT. Physicians who identified at least one strategy were then asked if each implemented strategy was “actually useful.” Results The 2019 survey was administered to 4,266 physicians, with a response rate of 43%. Both office- and hospital-based physicians most commonly reported that their practices had implemented voice-recognition dictation software (48 and 68%, respectively). Office- and hospital-based physicians identified self-care as the most commonly implemented personal change (48 and 47%, respectively). However, 26% of office-based and 15% of hospital-based physicians reported reducing clinical hours or working part-time to improve their experience working with HIT. The strategies identified as “actually useful” varied by practice setting and were not always the most widely implemented approaches. Conclusion Most physicians reported that both they personally and their practices had implemented strategies to improve their experience with HIT. Physicians found some of these strategies more helpful than others, and the strategies identified as most useful differed between office- and hospital-based physicians. From a workforce and access perspective, prioritizing strategies that physicians find “actually useful” is critical, as many physicians in both settings reported reducing clinical hours to improve their experience.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"05 1","pages":"e47 - e53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731338","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objectives While electronic health records (EHRs) have improved billing efficiency and note legibility, they may also disrupt clinical workflows, affect patient interactions, and contribute to physician burnout. This study aimed to identify effective strategies, as reported by physicians, to mitigate these EHR shortcomings. Methods The Rhode Island Department of Health administers a health information technology (HIT) survey biennially to all physicians in active practice statewide. The 2019 survey asked physicians about strategies implemented personally or by their practice to improve their experience working with HIT. Physicians who identified at least one strategy were then asked if each implemented strategy was “actually useful.” Results The 2019 survey was administered to 4,266 physicians, with a response rate of 43%. Both office- and hospital-based physicians most commonly reported that their practices had implemented voice-recognition dictation software (48 and 68%, respectively). Office- and hospital-based physicians identified self-care as the most commonly implemented personal change (48 and 47%, respectively). However, 26% of office-based and 15% of hospital-based physicians reported reducing clinical hours or working part-time to improve their experience working with HIT. The strategies identified as “actually useful” varied by practice setting and were not always the most widely implemented approaches. Conclusion Most physicians reported that both they personally and their practices had implemented strategies to improve their experience with HIT. Physicians found some of these strategies more helpful than others, and the strategies identified as most useful differed between office- and hospital-based physicians. From a workforce and access perspective, prioritizing strategies that physicians find “actually useful” is critical, as many physicians in both settings reported reducing clinical hours to improve their experience.
哪些策略可以提高医生对健康信息技术的体验?
虽然电子健康记录(EHRs)提高了计费效率和笔记的可读性,但它们也可能扰乱临床工作流程,影响患者互动,并导致医生职业倦怠。本研究旨在确定医生报告的有效策略,以减轻这些电子病历的缺点。方法罗德岛州卫生部每两年对全州所有在职医生进行一次健康信息技术(HIT)调查。2019年的调查向医生询问了个人或实践中实施的策略,以改善他们与HIT合作的体验。确定了至少一种策略的医生随后被问及每一种实施策略是否“实际上有用”。结果2019年对4266名医生进行了调查,回复率为43%。办公室和医院的医生最常报告说,他们的实践中使用了语音识别听写软件(分别为48%和68%)。办公室和医院的医生认为自我保健是最常见的个人改变(分别为48%和47%)。然而,26%的办公室医生和15%的医院医生报告减少了临床工作时间或兼职工作,以改善他们在HIT的工作经验。确定为“实际有用”的战略因实践环境而异,并不总是最广泛实施的方法。大多数医生报告说,他们个人和他们的实践已经实施了策略,以改善他们的经验与HIT。医生发现其中一些策略比其他策略更有帮助,而办公室医生和医院医生认为最有用的策略不同。从劳动力和准入的角度来看,优先考虑医生认为“真正有用”的策略是至关重要的,因为两种情况下的许多医生都表示减少了临床工作时间,以改善他们的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书