Toward a Better Understanding of Fieldwork Requirements in Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation Education

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Brent L. Hawkins, Kirstin L. Whitely, Susan Purrington, Erik Luvaas, Gena Bell Vargas, Emma Bentley-Gottel
{"title":"Toward a Better Understanding of Fieldwork Requirements in Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation Education","authors":"Brent L. Hawkins, Kirstin L. Whitely, Susan Purrington, Erik Luvaas, Gena Bell Vargas, Emma Bentley-Gottel","doi":"10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-12000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important aspect of preparing students for Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation (RT) professional practice is fieldwork education. In this study, fieldwork education was defined as a learning opportunity for RT students to develop practice competencies through hands-on experiences in applied RT service settings. Previous research has indicated the unanimous desire of stakeholders within the profession to improve the quality and consistency of RT education, particularly regarding fieldwork education experiences. This three-part study sought to develop a better understanding of the scope of RT fieldwork education within and across RT academic programs. Using a cross-sectional survey of academic programs, this study found that various types, amounts, guiding frameworks, and structures of fieldwork experiences existed. This article discusses implications such as the need for a guiding framework or model beyond following the minimum credentialing requirements, increased consistency of support provided by program faculty and staff, improved accreditation standards related to fieldwork, and how a consensus from the field on adoption of accreditation requirements could support consistency of fieldwork education.","PeriodicalId":45238,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Recreation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Recreation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-12000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important aspect of preparing students for Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation (RT) professional practice is fieldwork education. In this study, fieldwork education was defined as a learning opportunity for RT students to develop practice competencies through hands-on experiences in applied RT service settings. Previous research has indicated the unanimous desire of stakeholders within the profession to improve the quality and consistency of RT education, particularly regarding fieldwork education experiences. This three-part study sought to develop a better understanding of the scope of RT fieldwork education within and across RT academic programs. Using a cross-sectional survey of academic programs, this study found that various types, amounts, guiding frameworks, and structures of fieldwork experiences existed. This article discusses implications such as the need for a guiding framework or model beyond following the minimum credentialing requirements, increased consistency of support provided by program faculty and staff, improved accreditation standards related to fieldwork, and how a consensus from the field on adoption of accreditation requirements could support consistency of fieldwork education.
更好地理解娱乐(al)治疗/治疗性娱乐教育中的实地工作要求
为学生准备娱乐(al)治疗/治疗性娱乐(RT)专业实践的一个重要方面是实地调查教育。在本研究中,实地调查教育被定义为RT学生通过在应用RT服务环境中的实践经验来发展实践能力的学习机会。先前的研究表明,该行业的利益相关者一致希望提高RT教育的质量和一致性,特别是在实地调查教育经验方面。这项由三部分组成的研究旨在更好地理解RT学术项目中和跨RT学术项目的实地调查教育的范围。通过对学术项目的横断面调查,本研究发现存在各种类型、数量、指导框架和结构的实地考察经验。这篇文章讨论了一些影响,如除了遵循最低认证要求之外,还需要一个指导框架或模式,提高项目教职员工提供的支持的一致性,改进与实地调查相关的认证标准,以及实地调查就采用认证要求达成共识如何支持实地调查教育的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信