The Postmodern Legal Ordering of the Economy

Q3 Social Sciences
Ioannis Kampourakis
{"title":"The Postmodern Legal Ordering of the Economy","authors":"Ioannis Kampourakis","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.28.1.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article purports to show how the postmodern tenets of particularity, reflexivity, decentralization, and pluralism map on to current legal forms and structures of market regulation. This is the case in the regulatory paradigm of shaping markets \"from within,\" the aspiration of which is to embed public and social values in the operations of private corporate actors, while expanding private corporate actors' regulatory authority and scope of self-governance. As the state attempts to harness the regulatory potential of the social sphere to impose sanctions for corporate misconduct, the role of the law becomes to facilitate the permeability of private institutional structures to the pressures of the market and civil society—in short, law relies on and seeks to facilitate societal self-regulation. This mutation of the function of law reifies the asymmetries of social power in legal arrangements, while it eventually weakens the role of democratic politics as the principle of social ordering. At the same time, such new forms of market regulation do not challenge the structural inequalities encased in the original institutional setup of public and private legal infrastructure and thus fail to reconstitute market dynamics. The article questions the potential of the postmodern focus on particularity and pluralism to provide normative orientation for socially transformative projects against the backdrop of diffused private power, eventually attempting to trace new directions of critique at the intersection of law and political economy.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"101 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.28.1.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:This article purports to show how the postmodern tenets of particularity, reflexivity, decentralization, and pluralism map on to current legal forms and structures of market regulation. This is the case in the regulatory paradigm of shaping markets "from within," the aspiration of which is to embed public and social values in the operations of private corporate actors, while expanding private corporate actors' regulatory authority and scope of self-governance. As the state attempts to harness the regulatory potential of the social sphere to impose sanctions for corporate misconduct, the role of the law becomes to facilitate the permeability of private institutional structures to the pressures of the market and civil society—in short, law relies on and seeks to facilitate societal self-regulation. This mutation of the function of law reifies the asymmetries of social power in legal arrangements, while it eventually weakens the role of democratic politics as the principle of social ordering. At the same time, such new forms of market regulation do not challenge the structural inequalities encased in the original institutional setup of public and private legal infrastructure and thus fail to reconstitute market dynamics. The article questions the potential of the postmodern focus on particularity and pluralism to provide normative orientation for socially transformative projects against the backdrop of diffused private power, eventually attempting to trace new directions of critique at the intersection of law and political economy.
后现代经济的法律秩序
摘要:本文旨在展示后现代主义的特殊性、自反性、分散化和多元主义原则是如何映射到当前市场监管的法律形式和结构上的。“从内部”塑造市场的监管模式就是这样,其愿望是将公共和社会价值观嵌入私营企业行为者的运营中,同时扩大私营企业行动者的监管权限和自治范围。随着国家试图利用社会领域的监管潜力对企业不当行为实施制裁,法律的作用变成了促进私人制度结构对市场和民间社会压力的渗透——简言之,法律依赖并寻求促进社会自律。法律功能的这种突变具体化了法律安排中社会权力的不对称性,同时最终削弱了民主政治作为社会秩序原则的作用。与此同时,这种新形式的市场监管并没有挑战公共和私人法律基础设施的原始制度设置中所包含的结构性不平等,因此无法重建市场动态。文章质疑后现代对特殊性和多元主义的关注,在私人权力分散的背景下为社会变革项目提供规范性取向的潜力,最终试图在法律和政治经济学的交叉点上寻找新的批判方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信