Yazar Otorite Dizininde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar: Ankara Üniversitesi Örneği

Q4 Social Sciences
Bilgi Dunyasi Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.15612/BD.2021.550
Okan Koç, Doğan Atılgan
{"title":"Yazar Otorite Dizininde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar: Ankara Üniversitesi Örneği","authors":"Okan Koç, Doğan Atılgan","doi":"10.15612/BD.2021.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authority directories have a key role in ensuring national and international standardization as well as facilitating the sharing of the library collection effectively and accurately with the users. The fact that author names are preferred as a search option in access to information reveals the necessity of author authority directories. Author authority directories are seen as a must at the point of controlling the library collection. In this regard, the necessity of author authority indexes, their importance in terms of bibliographic control and the problems encountered while creating an authority index are discussed in the study. Within the scope of the research, 8980 sources of information in the catalog of Ankara University Library selected as a sample were examined. At the same time, existing printed sources, databases and electronic resources were examined in order to determine the different names and pseudonyms of the authors. In addition, the authority records of Turkish authors on the VIAF were compared with the records of Ankara University Library, and author input consistency and errors were determined. It was emphasized which rules and principles should be taken into account when preparing an author authority index under the guidance of VIAF and RDA. As a result of the research, suggestions were made on how to prepare author authority directories and to expand their use.","PeriodicalId":38318,"journal":{"name":"Bilgi Dunyasi","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilgi Dunyasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2021.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authority directories have a key role in ensuring national and international standardization as well as facilitating the sharing of the library collection effectively and accurately with the users. The fact that author names are preferred as a search option in access to information reveals the necessity of author authority directories. Author authority directories are seen as a must at the point of controlling the library collection. In this regard, the necessity of author authority indexes, their importance in terms of bibliographic control and the problems encountered while creating an authority index are discussed in the study. Within the scope of the research, 8980 sources of information in the catalog of Ankara University Library selected as a sample were examined. At the same time, existing printed sources, databases and electronic resources were examined in order to determine the different names and pseudonyms of the authors. In addition, the authority records of Turkish authors on the VIAF were compared with the records of Ankara University Library, and author input consistency and errors were determined. It was emphasized which rules and principles should be taken into account when preparing an author authority index under the guidance of VIAF and RDA. As a result of the research, suggestions were made on how to prepare author authority directories and to expand their use.
授权目录中的问题:安卡拉大学示例
权威目录在确保国家和国际标准化以及促进与用户有效、准确地共享图书馆藏品方面发挥着关键作用。在获取信息时,作者姓名是首选的搜索选项,这一事实表明了作者权威目录的必要性。作者权限目录被视为控制图书馆收藏的必要条件。在这方面,本文讨论了作者权威索引的必要性、它们在书目控制方面的重要性以及在创建权威索引时遇到的问题。在研究范围内,对安卡拉大学图书馆目录中的8980个信息来源进行了抽样检查。同时,审查了现有的印刷资料、数据库和电子资源,以确定提交人的不同姓名和假名。此外,将土耳其作者在VIAF上的权威记录与安卡拉大学图书馆的记录进行了比较,并确定了作者输入的一致性和错误。有人强调,在VIAF和RDA的指导下编制作者权威指数时,应考虑哪些规则和原则。研究的结果是,就如何编制作者权威目录和扩大其使用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bilgi Dunyasi
Bilgi Dunyasi Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信