Moral capital of CSR and firm performance: does a shift from voluntary to mandatory policy matter in an Indian context?

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS
K. Oware, Abdul-Aziz Iddrisu
{"title":"Moral capital of CSR and firm performance: does a shift from voluntary to mandatory policy matter in an Indian context?","authors":"K. Oware, Abdul-Aziz Iddrisu","doi":"10.1108/sbr-03-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is a current agitation by community leaders, global leaders and society on the morality aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of firms. The change in policy raises the question of whether moral capital is affected. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether the shift from voluntary to mandatory reporting increases the moral capital of CSR and also whether moral capital affects the firm performance of listed firms in India.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study examines 800 firm-year observations on the Bombay Stock Exchange (split into 320 firm-year observations for the voluntary period and 480 firm-year observations for the mandatory period). This study uses panel regression with random effect assumptions for data interpretation.\n\n\nFindings\nThe first findings show that a shift from voluntary to mandatory policy on CSR increases the moral capital value of listed firms in India. The second and third findings show that voluntary reporting of moral capital has no significant association with market performance (stock price returns [SPR]) or firm value (Tobin’s q). The fourth findings show a negative and statistically significant association between mandatory reporting of moral capital and SPR but an insignificant association with Tobin’s q. This study conducted a robustness test, and results show that the previous year 1 and 2 moral capital for voluntary and mandatory periods has no association with SPR and Tobin’s q.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough prior research has examined the effect of change in policy from voluntary to mandatory reporting on firm performance, little is known about the impact of moral capital on firm performance for the emerging economies, including India.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-03-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose There is a current agitation by community leaders, global leaders and society on the morality aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of firms. The change in policy raises the question of whether moral capital is affected. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether the shift from voluntary to mandatory reporting increases the moral capital of CSR and also whether moral capital affects the firm performance of listed firms in India. Design/methodology/approach This study examines 800 firm-year observations on the Bombay Stock Exchange (split into 320 firm-year observations for the voluntary period and 480 firm-year observations for the mandatory period). This study uses panel regression with random effect assumptions for data interpretation. Findings The first findings show that a shift from voluntary to mandatory policy on CSR increases the moral capital value of listed firms in India. The second and third findings show that voluntary reporting of moral capital has no significant association with market performance (stock price returns [SPR]) or firm value (Tobin’s q). The fourth findings show a negative and statistically significant association between mandatory reporting of moral capital and SPR but an insignificant association with Tobin’s q. This study conducted a robustness test, and results show that the previous year 1 and 2 moral capital for voluntary and mandatory periods has no association with SPR and Tobin’s q. Originality/value Although prior research has examined the effect of change in policy from voluntary to mandatory reporting on firm performance, little is known about the impact of moral capital on firm performance for the emerging economies, including India.
企业社会责任的道德资本与企业绩效:从自愿政策到强制性政策的转变在印度的背景下重要吗?
目前,社区领导人、全球领导人和社会各界对企业社会责任(CSR)活动的道德方面进行了激烈的讨论。政策的变化引发了道德资本是否受到影响的问题。因此,本研究旨在检验从自愿报告到强制性报告的转变是否增加了企业社会责任的道德资本,以及道德资本是否影响了印度上市公司的企业绩效。设计/方法/方法本研究考察了孟买证券交易所的800个公司年度观察结果(分为自愿期的320个公司年度观察结果和强制性期的480个公司年度观察结果)。本研究采用随机效应假设的面板回归进行数据解释。第一个发现表明,企业社会责任政策从自愿向强制性的转变增加了印度上市公司的道德资本价值。第二和第三个研究结果表明,自愿报告道德资本与市场表现(股票价格回报[SPR])或公司价值(托宾q)之间没有显著的关联。第四个研究结果表明,强制报告道德资本与SPR之间存在负相关且具有统计学意义,但与托宾q之间的关联不显著。结果表明,前一年和第2年自愿性和强制性期间的道德资本与SPR和Tobin q.独创性/价值没有关联。尽管先前的研究已经检查了从自愿性报告到强制性报告的政策变化对公司绩效的影响,但对包括印度在内的新兴经济体的道德资本对公司绩效的影响知之甚少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信