WHEN TIME FLIES: STATE AND TRAIT BOREDOM, TIME PERCEPTION, AND HEDONIC TASK APPRAISALS

Q4 Psychology
Emily R. Weiss, M. Todman, Özge Pazar, Sophia Mullens, K. Maurer, Alexandra C. Romano
{"title":"WHEN TIME FLIES: STATE AND TRAIT BOREDOM, TIME PERCEPTION, AND HEDONIC TASK APPRAISALS","authors":"Emily R. Weiss, M. Todman, Özge Pazar, Sophia Mullens, K. Maurer, Alexandra C. Romano","doi":"10.37708/PSYCT.V14I1.559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An abundance of empirical research has established that a robust, positive association exists between feelings of boredom and the illusion of temporal slowing. Although state and trait forms of boredom are distinct constructs, the way these variables interact with one another to impact time perception is unknown. To further explore the association between boredom and time perception, a modified replication of a study that examined the impact of discrepancies between expected and perceived time progression on hedonic appraisals was conducted. The paradigm was extended through the inclusion of validated measures of trait and recent state boredom. Seventy-two participants ( N = 72, aged 18-52, M = 23.06, SD = 5.73) were led to believe that they would perform an intrinsically unengaging task for 5 (Time Drags), 10 (Real Time), or 15 minutes (Time Flies). Consistent with previous findings, participants in the Time Drags condition reported time as progressing significantly slower than participants in the other two conditions. Moreover, participants in the Time Drags condition rated the task as significantly more aversive than did participants in the Time Flies condition. This association remained significant even when controlling for levels of trait and recent state boredom. However, the Real Time and Time Flies conditions did not differ from one another in terms of task ratings or perceived time progression. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":"14 1","pages":"150-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/PSYCT.V14I1.559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An abundance of empirical research has established that a robust, positive association exists between feelings of boredom and the illusion of temporal slowing. Although state and trait forms of boredom are distinct constructs, the way these variables interact with one another to impact time perception is unknown. To further explore the association between boredom and time perception, a modified replication of a study that examined the impact of discrepancies between expected and perceived time progression on hedonic appraisals was conducted. The paradigm was extended through the inclusion of validated measures of trait and recent state boredom. Seventy-two participants ( N = 72, aged 18-52, M = 23.06, SD = 5.73) were led to believe that they would perform an intrinsically unengaging task for 5 (Time Drags), 10 (Real Time), or 15 minutes (Time Flies). Consistent with previous findings, participants in the Time Drags condition reported time as progressing significantly slower than participants in the other two conditions. Moreover, participants in the Time Drags condition rated the task as significantly more aversive than did participants in the Time Flies condition. This association remained significant even when controlling for levels of trait and recent state boredom. However, the Real Time and Time Flies conditions did not differ from one another in terms of task ratings or perceived time progression. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
时光飞逝:状态和特质无聊、时间感知和享乐任务评估
大量的实证研究表明,无聊感和时间放慢的幻觉之间存在着强有力的、积极的联系。尽管无聊的状态和特征形式是不同的结构,但这些变量相互作用影响时间感知的方式尚不清楚。为了进一步探索无聊和时间感知之间的联系,对一项研究进行了修改复制,该研究考察了预期和感知时间进展之间的差异对享乐评价的影响。该范式通过纳入对特质和最近状态无聊的有效测量来扩展。72名参与者(N=72,年龄18-52岁,M=23.06,SD=5.73)被引导相信他们会执行一项本质上没有吸引力的任务,持续5分钟(时间拖动)、10分钟(实时)或15分钟(时间飞行)。与之前的研究结果一致,时间拖延状态下的参与者报告称,时间进展明显慢于其他两种状态的参与者。此外,时间拖延条件下的参与者对该任务的评价明显高于时间飞逝条件下的受访者。即使在控制特质水平和最近的无聊状态时,这种关联仍然很显著。然而,“实时”和“时间飞行”条件在任务评级或感知时间进展方面没有差异。讨论了这些发现的意义和未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信