Microbiological characteristics of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in an Asian tertiary hospital 2011–2014

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Mui Hian Sim
{"title":"Microbiological characteristics of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in an Asian\ntertiary hospital 2011–2014","authors":"Mui Hian Sim","doi":"10.33235/RSAJ.15.1.5-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPeritonitis is the leading cause of technique failure among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The study aimed to examine the microbiological characteristics of PD-related peritonitis in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.\nMethods\nA retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Data of patients diagnosed with PD-related peritonitis from January 2011 to December 2014 were collected. Microbiological characteristics of PD-related peritonitis were reported using descriptive statistics.\nResults\nA total of 377 episodes of peritonitis occurred in 247 patients. The average peritonitis rate in the centre was 0.23 episodes per patient year. There were 118 (31.2%) Gram-positive, 98 (26.0%) Gram-negative, 58 (15.4%) polymicrobial, 16 (4.2%) fungal, 2 (0.5%) mycobacterium and 85 (22.6%) culture-negative, PD-related peritonitis episodes.\nThe three main Gram-positive micro-organisms isolated from peritoneal fluid cultures were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus (CoNS) (n=70, 17.6%), Streptococcus spp. (n=52, 13.1%) and Enterococcus spp. (n=28, 7.1%), while the three main Gram-negative isolates were Escherichia coli (n=50, 12.6%), Klebsiella spp. (n=46, 11.6%) and Enterobacter spp. (n=27, 6.8%). Candida parapsilosis (n=9, 1.9%) was the commonest fungus identified.\nOnly 33 (47.1%) CoNS strains were sensitive to cefazolin, which was used in the institution for empiric coverage of Gram-positive micro-organisms in PD-peritonitis. All Streptococcus strains were sensitive to cefazolin (n=52). The majority of Escherichia coli (n=38, 76%), Klebsiella spp. (n=37, 80.4%) and Enterobacter spp. (n=18, 66.7%) strains were sensitive to gentamicin, the empiric antibiotic used for coverage of Gram-negative micro-organisms.\nConclusions\nOur findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring of micro-organisms and their antimicrobial sensitivities in determining appropriate, centre-specific empirical antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":42629,"journal":{"name":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Society of Australasia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/RSAJ.15.1.5-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Peritonitis is the leading cause of technique failure among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The study aimed to examine the microbiological characteristics of PD-related peritonitis in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed at Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Data of patients diagnosed with PD-related peritonitis from January 2011 to December 2014 were collected. Microbiological characteristics of PD-related peritonitis were reported using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 377 episodes of peritonitis occurred in 247 patients. The average peritonitis rate in the centre was 0.23 episodes per patient year. There were 118 (31.2%) Gram-positive, 98 (26.0%) Gram-negative, 58 (15.4%) polymicrobial, 16 (4.2%) fungal, 2 (0.5%) mycobacterium and 85 (22.6%) culture-negative, PD-related peritonitis episodes. The three main Gram-positive micro-organisms isolated from peritoneal fluid cultures were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus (CoNS) (n=70, 17.6%), Streptococcus spp. (n=52, 13.1%) and Enterococcus spp. (n=28, 7.1%), while the three main Gram-negative isolates were Escherichia coli (n=50, 12.6%), Klebsiella spp. (n=46, 11.6%) and Enterobacter spp. (n=27, 6.8%). Candida parapsilosis (n=9, 1.9%) was the commonest fungus identified. Only 33 (47.1%) CoNS strains were sensitive to cefazolin, which was used in the institution for empiric coverage of Gram-positive micro-organisms in PD-peritonitis. All Streptococcus strains were sensitive to cefazolin (n=52). The majority of Escherichia coli (n=38, 76%), Klebsiella spp. (n=37, 80.4%) and Enterobacter spp. (n=18, 66.7%) strains were sensitive to gentamicin, the empiric antibiotic used for coverage of Gram-negative micro-organisms. Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring of micro-organisms and their antimicrobial sensitivities in determining appropriate, centre-specific empirical antibiotics.
2011-2014年亚洲某三级医院腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎的微生物学特征
背景腹膜炎是腹膜透析(PD)患者技术失败的主要原因。本研究旨在检查新加坡一家三级医院PD相关腹膜炎的微生物学特征。方法在新加坡综合医院(SGH)进行回顾性横断面研究。收集2011年1月至2014年12月诊断为PD相关腹膜炎的患者的数据。使用描述性统计报告PD相关腹膜炎的微生物学特征。结果247例患者共发生腹膜炎377例。该中心的平均腹膜炎发生率为0.23次/患者年。有118例(31.2%)革兰氏阳性,98例(26.0%)革兰氏阴性,58例(15.4%)多菌,16例(4.2%)真菌,2例(0.5%)分枝杆菌和85例(22.6%)培养阴性,PD相关腹膜炎发作。从腹膜液培养物中分离到的三种主要革兰氏阳性微生物是凝固酶阴性金黄色葡萄球菌(CoNS)(n=70,17.6%)、链球菌(n=52,13.1%)和肠球菌(n=28,7.1%),而三种主要的革兰氏阴性分离物是大肠杆菌(n=50,12.6%),克雷伯菌属(n=46,11.6%)和肠杆菌属(n=27,6.8%)。近裸念珠菌属(n=9,1.9%)是最常见的真菌。只有33株(47.1%)CoNS菌株对头孢唑林敏感,该机构对PD腹膜炎中的革兰氏阳性微生物进行了经验性覆盖。所有链球菌菌株均对头孢唑林敏感(n=52)。大多数大肠杆菌(n=38,76%)、克雷伯菌属(n=37,80.4%)和肠杆菌属(n=18,66.7%)菌株对庆大霉素敏感,庆大霉素是用于覆盖革兰氏阴性微生物的经验性抗生素,中心特异性经验性抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信