Joining the Navy to Become a Physician: The Typical Experience.

Eric Goodrich
{"title":"Joining the Navy to Become a Physician: The Typical Experience.","authors":"Eric Goodrich","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe decision to enter the Navy as a physician is a major career choice. However, there are no published studies that address the typical Navy physician's experience in the Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) programs. The purpose of this qualitative study is to describe the typical Navy physician's experience in the HPSP and USUHS programs.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nAn anonymous online survey containing 47 questions was distributed to 63 Navy HPSP and USUHS physicians who started internships from 2008 to 2015. Participants were chosen by using purposeful, criterion, and snowball sampling methods with whom the author had a professional relationship during his military experience. The survey data were plotted in Excel spreadsheets and graphs according to six sub-research questions. Mean, SD, Likert scale 1-5, and grouping of free text responses were recorded.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 54 out of 63 Navy physicians (85.7%) responded to the survey. Navy physicians got their first-choice residency selection of 67.3% of the time, 34.6% went straight through residency without interruptions, 44.2% answered definitely or probably that military match changed their residency selection compared to them applying for civilian residency, and 46.2% answered definitely or probably that it was more difficult to get into military versus civilian residency. Participants answered definitely or probably that military experience puts them ahead of civilians in terms of leadership (82.7%), prior medical experience (46.2%), and applying for civilian residency (76.2%). Common positive themes of free-text answers included having financial stability, unique life experiences, and serving their country. Common negative themes included lack of career control, lack of knowledge regarding HPSP/USUHS programs, and delay in residency and career.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe principal findings in this study are that most Navy physicians favored paid medical school/financial support, working overseas and in unique operational climates, having unique life experiences, leadership skills, and prior military experience put them ahead of their civilian colleagues, thought the Navy experience was worth it, and would join again if given the opportunity. However, most Navy physicians had a lack of career control due to needs of the Navy, lack of knowledge regarding residency selection, operational billets, and active duty service obligation, had more difficulty getting into a military residency of their choice versus civilians, and had interrupted residency training/training delays. The Navy would possibly benefit from a nationwide HPSP/USUHS physician mentorship program and an educational seminar to increase medical student applicant knowledge, which may improve recruiting and retention.","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The decision to enter the Navy as a physician is a major career choice. However, there are no published studies that address the typical Navy physician's experience in the Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) programs. The purpose of this qualitative study is to describe the typical Navy physician's experience in the HPSP and USUHS programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS An anonymous online survey containing 47 questions was distributed to 63 Navy HPSP and USUHS physicians who started internships from 2008 to 2015. Participants were chosen by using purposeful, criterion, and snowball sampling methods with whom the author had a professional relationship during his military experience. The survey data were plotted in Excel spreadsheets and graphs according to six sub-research questions. Mean, SD, Likert scale 1-5, and grouping of free text responses were recorded. RESULTS A total of 54 out of 63 Navy physicians (85.7%) responded to the survey. Navy physicians got their first-choice residency selection of 67.3% of the time, 34.6% went straight through residency without interruptions, 44.2% answered definitely or probably that military match changed their residency selection compared to them applying for civilian residency, and 46.2% answered definitely or probably that it was more difficult to get into military versus civilian residency. Participants answered definitely or probably that military experience puts them ahead of civilians in terms of leadership (82.7%), prior medical experience (46.2%), and applying for civilian residency (76.2%). Common positive themes of free-text answers included having financial stability, unique life experiences, and serving their country. Common negative themes included lack of career control, lack of knowledge regarding HPSP/USUHS programs, and delay in residency and career. CONCLUSIONS The principal findings in this study are that most Navy physicians favored paid medical school/financial support, working overseas and in unique operational climates, having unique life experiences, leadership skills, and prior military experience put them ahead of their civilian colleagues, thought the Navy experience was worth it, and would join again if given the opportunity. However, most Navy physicians had a lack of career control due to needs of the Navy, lack of knowledge regarding residency selection, operational billets, and active duty service obligation, had more difficulty getting into a military residency of their choice versus civilians, and had interrupted residency training/training delays. The Navy would possibly benefit from a nationwide HPSP/USUHS physician mentorship program and an educational seminar to increase medical student applicant knowledge, which may improve recruiting and retention.
加入海军成为一名医生:典型的经历。
简介决定进入海军当医生是一个主要的职业选择。然而,并没有发表研究来解决典型的海军医生在健康专业奖学金计划(HPSP)和健康科学统一服务大学(USUHS)项目中的经验。这项定性研究的目的是描述典型的海军医生在HPSP和USUHS项目中的经验。材料和方法一项包含47个问题的匿名在线调查被分发给了63名2008年至2015年开始实习的海军HPSP和USUHS医生。参与者是通过有目的的、标准的和滚雪球式的抽样方法选择的,作者在军事经历中与他们有专业关系。调查数据根据六个子研究问题绘制在Excel电子表格和图表中。记录平均值、SD、Likert量表1-5和自由文本回答的分组。结果63名海军医生中有54人(85.7%)对调查做出了回应。海军医生有67.3%的时间选择了他们的首选居留权,34.6%的医生直接完成了居留权而没有中断,44.2%的医生肯定或可能回答说,与申请民事居留权相比,军事匹配改变了他们的居留权选择,46.2%的人肯定地或可能地回答说,进入军队居住比进入平民居住更困难。参与者肯定或可能回答说,军事经验使他们在领导力(82.7%)、既往医疗经验(46.2%)和申请民事居留权(76.2%)方面领先于平民。自由文本回答的常见积极主题包括经济稳定、独特的生活经历和为国服务。常见的负面主题包括缺乏职业控制,缺乏关于HPSP/USHHS项目的知识,以及住院和职业延误。结论:这项研究的主要发现是,大多数海军医生都喜欢带薪医学院/财政支持,在海外工作,在独特的作战环境中工作,拥有独特的生活经验、领导技能和先前的军事经验,这使他们领先于文职同事,认为海军的经历是值得的,如果有机会,他们会再次加入。然而,由于海军的需求,大多数海军医生缺乏职业控制,缺乏关于居留权选择、操作费用和现役服务义务的知识,与平民相比,他们更难获得自己选择的军事居留权,并且中断了居留培训/培训延迟。海军可能会受益于全国范围内的HPSP/USHS医生指导计划和教育研讨会,以增加医学生申请人的知识,这可能会提高招聘和留用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信